European Review of Social Psychology 2001
DOI: 10.1002/0470013478.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and Cognitive Influences in Group Brainstorming: Predicting Production Gains and Losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with fixation effects in problem solving (Smith & Blankenship, 1989) and recall (Smith & Vela, 1991), time off the task ("incubation") might resolve these problems because during off-task time activation of earlier ideas may decline. Indeed, there is some evidence that short breaks during brainstorming enhance performance considerably and prevent the usual sharp decline ofperformance over time (Paulus et al, 2002). SIAM versus the matrix model.…”
Section: Siammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with fixation effects in problem solving (Smith & Blankenship, 1989) and recall (Smith & Vela, 1991), time off the task ("incubation") might resolve these problems because during off-task time activation of earlier ideas may decline. Indeed, there is some evidence that short breaks during brainstorming enhance performance considerably and prevent the usual sharp decline ofperformance over time (Paulus et al, 2002). SIAM versus the matrix model.…”
Section: Siammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, our aim is to review and integrate the research literature on group ideation (see for earlier reviews: Lamm & Trommsdorff, 1973;Paulus, Dugosh, Dzindolet, Coskun, & Putman, 2002;Stroebe & Diehl, 1994). Much of the early research has considered social-motivational factors, such as social comparison processes, evaluation apprehension, and free riding (e.g., Stroebe & Diehl, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A co-worker's creativity can be influenced through social group comparisons as well as social cognitive processes. By way of social comparison, group members -observing each other's creative output and motivated by intergroup or intragroup rivalrymay try to match the accomplishments of high performing co-workers (Paulus et al, 2002). Creative co-workers can also serve as role models by demonstrating creative behaviors for others to observe and imitate based on an element of social cognitive theory termed observational learning in which employees gain skills and develop strategies that enhance their capacity to be creative (Bandura, 1986;Zhou, 2003).…”
Section: Work Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, recall of exposed ideas was related to enhanced idea generation. These results are consistent with the social/cognitive influence model of group brainstorming (Paulus, Dugosh, Dzindolet, Putman, & Coskun, 2002). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most brainstorming research has focused on social factors in the productivity gap between interactive and nominal groups (see Paulus, Dugosh, Dzindolet, Putman, & Coskun, 2002). However, researchers have recently begun to investigate cognitive factors as well, in particular the extent to which idea exchange influences idea generation (Dugosh, Paulus, Roland, & Yang, 2000;Nijstad, Diehl, & Stroebe, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%