2016
DOI: 10.1177/0033294116658605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Anxiety and Interpretation Bias

Abstract: This study examined how positive-scale assessment of ambiguous social stimuli affects interpretation bias in social anxiety. Participants with high and low social anxiety (N = 60) performed a facial expression discrimination task to assess interpretation bias. Participants were then randomly assigned to assess the emotion of briefly presented faces either on a negative or on a positive scale. They subsequently repeated the facial expression discrimination task. Participants with high versus low social anxiety … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We created happy, sad, and angry faces with a default option of the Facegen software (www.facegen.com). Similar facial stimuli created by the same software were used without problems with Asian participants in other published studies (e.g., Mei et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2016). Although our participants did not report any problem in recognizing the emotional categories of the current stimuli, a validation procedure is needed in a future study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We created happy, sad, and angry faces with a default option of the Facegen software (www.facegen.com). Similar facial stimuli created by the same software were used without problems with Asian participants in other published studies (e.g., Mei et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2016). Although our participants did not report any problem in recognizing the emotional categories of the current stimuli, a validation procedure is needed in a future study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%