2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00531-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social approval and trait self-esteem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides caring for the welfare of others, people also wish to feel closely tied to significant others and to engage in relationships that involve cooperation, group solidarity, and emotional attachment (Agnew 2014). This desire for close ties (even when there is no extrinsic reward) is related to people's want to feel accepted and valued by others and their experiencing of negative emotions when rejected (Blackhart et al 2011;Deci and Ryan 2000;DeWall and Bushman 2011;Leary and Cottrell 1999;MacDonald, Saltzman, and Leary 2003).…”
Section: Desire For Close Ties To Certain Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides caring for the welfare of others, people also wish to feel closely tied to significant others and to engage in relationships that involve cooperation, group solidarity, and emotional attachment (Agnew 2014). This desire for close ties (even when there is no extrinsic reward) is related to people's want to feel accepted and valued by others and their experiencing of negative emotions when rejected (Blackhart et al 2011;Deci and Ryan 2000;DeWall and Bushman 2011;Leary and Cottrell 1999;MacDonald, Saltzman, and Leary 2003).…”
Section: Desire For Close Ties To Certain Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we invoke the metaphor of belongingness as a fuel tank (e.g. Leary, Tambor, Terdal, & Downs, 1995), rejection empties the tank of fuel. This lack of fuel causes the car to malfunction, leading to negative behaviour like aggression.…”
Section: Belongingness Theory and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trait self-esteem and state self-esteem are both aspects of the sociometer. Whereas state self-esteem provides momentary information about how well one is doing as a mate, trait self-esteem may be a more stable representation of one's relational potential over time, being determined by one's past experiences of inclusion and rejection, and by one's presumed standing on and perceived importance of socially desirable traits such as physical attractiveness or social status (Anthony et al, 2007;Leary & Baumeister, 2000;MacDonald, Saltzman, & Leary, 2003). Fluctuations in state self-esteem may occur around individually different, more stable levels of trait self-esteem (Leary, Haupt, et al, 1998), so that the effect of capacity rejection on state self-esteem would be much lower for participants high on trait self-esteem.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%