2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital and innovation performance of digital firms: Serial mediation effect of cross-border knowledge search and absorptive capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical study examines the relationship of social capital and innovation performance of firms by using data of 217 Chinese digital firms. Results indicate the social capital and digital Organizational Performance were significant relationship exists (Lyu, Peng, Yang, Li, & Gu, 2022). A Turkish study of Social capital was imbalance the firm ambidexterity and performance, role of social capital inhibiting the performance due to low generalized trust (Wasti, Terzi, & Kerti, 2022).…”
Section: Corporate Social Environment Interactions With Organizationalmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Empirical study examines the relationship of social capital and innovation performance of firms by using data of 217 Chinese digital firms. Results indicate the social capital and digital Organizational Performance were significant relationship exists (Lyu, Peng, Yang, Li, & Gu, 2022). A Turkish study of Social capital was imbalance the firm ambidexterity and performance, role of social capital inhibiting the performance due to low generalized trust (Wasti, Terzi, & Kerti, 2022).…”
Section: Corporate Social Environment Interactions With Organizationalmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…KM in KIBS is an extremely relevant topic, but academic research in the field, including in the main academic flows, is rather narrow [8,[24][25][26][27][28]30,57,58,[78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86]. Also, many authors ignore the main attributes of knowledge, which are intangibility and nonlinearity [53,87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study utilized confirmatory factor analysis to examine the structural validity of the scales (Lyu et al. , 2022) (see Table 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study utilized confirmatory factor analysis to examine the structural validity of the scales (Lyu et al, 2022) (see Table 2). From Table 2, the five-factor model has the best fit compared to other models (χ 2 5 520.207, df 5 314, χ 2 /df 5 1.657, GFI 5 0.901, CFI 5 0.939, RSMEA 5 0.046).…”
Section: Reliability and Validity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%