2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0419-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Capital, Diversity and Giving or Receiving Help Among Neighbours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 31 Evidence suggests that some contextual characteristics (eg, community social capital) may increase opportunities for enriching social relationships. 32 A community in which there are plenty of local activities could provide more opportunities for maintaining mental health. Our findings suggest that these effects may be stronger for socially vulnerable people, resulting in less depression inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 Evidence suggests that some contextual characteristics (eg, community social capital) may increase opportunities for enriching social relationships. 32 A community in which there are plenty of local activities could provide more opportunities for maintaining mental health. Our findings suggest that these effects may be stronger for socially vulnerable people, resulting in less depression inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our four dependent variables are formed by four different so-called wallet-items (cf. Stolle et al 2008 ; Gundelach and Freitag 2014 ; Mata and Pendakur 2014 ). The wallet-items have several advantages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From previous research, there are indications that ties explicitly bound to neighbourhoods are quite consistently negatively related to heterogeneity (Finney and Jivraj 2013 ; Guest et al 2008 ; Koopmans and Schaeffer 2015 ; Letki 2008 ; Putnam 2007 ; Rios et al 2012 ; Schaeffer 2013 ; Twigg et al 2010 ; Völker et al 2007 ; but see f.i. Mata and Pendakur 2014 for an exception). Concurrently, there is no clear consensus on the direction of the relationship between heterogeneity and indicators of interethnic cohesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tolsma, van der Meer, and Gesthuizen 2009;Dinesen 2013), helping among neighbors (Mata and Pendakur 2014), the radius of generalized trust (Delhey, Newton, and Welzel 2011), or participation in associations (e.g. Gesthuizen, van der Meer, and Scheepers 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%