2013
DOI: 10.1080/13532944.2013.783269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social cohesion and economic development: some reflections on the Italian case

Abstract: The processes of globalisation, market deregulation and the retreat of the welfare state in advanced capitalist societies have revitalised the debate about how to reconcile economic development and social cohesion. This debate has been widespread in Italy, where great differences occur between local contexts as regards economic performance, the level of inequality and, more generally, the cohesion of the social fabric. Within this framework, this paper explores the level of both economic development and social… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every model is specified considering socio-demographic household variables on one hand, and the area of residence on the other. The control variables are: the presence of children, which was treated as a dummy variable, by distinguishing between households with or without children; the number of earners within the household, which was grouped in three categories: no earner, one-earner, two or more earners; the size of the household, which is divided into five categories, from a one-member household to households of five or more members; the household age: because the age of the members within the household may vary greatly, we use the age of the highest income earner by distinguishing three age ranges: 18-39, 40-54, and 55 and over; the residential location of the households, due to the fact that Italy is characterized by deep socio-economic differences between geographical areas (Busso and Storti 2013). In line with the literature, we distinguish three main areas: northern Italy, central Italy, and southern Italy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every model is specified considering socio-demographic household variables on one hand, and the area of residence on the other. The control variables are: the presence of children, which was treated as a dummy variable, by distinguishing between households with or without children; the number of earners within the household, which was grouped in three categories: no earner, one-earner, two or more earners; the size of the household, which is divided into five categories, from a one-member household to households of five or more members; the household age: because the age of the members within the household may vary greatly, we use the age of the highest income earner by distinguishing three age ranges: 18-39, 40-54, and 55 and over; the residential location of the households, due to the fact that Italy is characterized by deep socio-economic differences between geographical areas (Busso and Storti 2013). In line with the literature, we distinguish three main areas: northern Italy, central Italy, and southern Italy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All in all, this process narrows the socio‐economic distances between peripheries and wealthier areas (see Table 1). It thus seemed that the Kuznets curve, according to which economic and territorial inequalities are high during underdevelopment stages, increase during the early stages of development and then tend to decrease, was corroborated (Busso & Storti, 2013; Viesti, 2021).…”
Section: Spatial Imbalances and Peripheries: Originating Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apart from the insights concerning social inequalities, we can claim that the main provinces of Lombardy are wealthy places (Busso and Storti 2013). In recent years, however, they have also experienced persistent economic problems (e.g.…”
Section: Correlated Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%