1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199902)13:1<79::aid-acp613>3.0.co;2-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social competence and sociomoral reasoning in young offenders

Abstract: This study considers the relationship between social competence, sociomoral reasoning, and self‐reported delinquency in a sample of convicted young offenders. Correlations across these factors showed that social competence was significantly related to delinquency. This finding was corroborated by multiple regression, which showed that social competence was the most significant predictor of self‐reported delinquency. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sub-populations of at-risk young people are not mutually exclusive; those with learning disabilities and/or a history of conduct disorder are, for example, more likely to sustain brain injuries in motor vehicle accidents (Haas et al, 1987), as are young people who abuse alcohol and other drugs (Tarter et al, 1995). A number of studies have suggested a significant association between juvenile offending and poor social skills/poor socio-moral reasoning (Palmer & Hollin, 1999). Further, some preliminary research has suggested an association between juvenile delinquency and poor language abilities (Davis et al, 1991;Putnins, 1999;Humber & Snow, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Sub-populations of at-risk young people are not mutually exclusive; those with learning disabilities and/or a history of conduct disorder are, for example, more likely to sustain brain injuries in motor vehicle accidents (Haas et al, 1987), as are young people who abuse alcohol and other drugs (Tarter et al, 1995). A number of studies have suggested a significant association between juvenile offending and poor social skills/poor socio-moral reasoning (Palmer & Hollin, 1999). Further, some preliminary research has suggested an association between juvenile delinquency and poor language abilities (Davis et al, 1991;Putnins, 1999;Humber & Snow, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…When social skills do not develop appropriately, the consequences can range from mild functional impairments to externalized behaviours such as aggression or relational difficulties leading to conflict with peers or adults (Contreras & Cano, 2016 ; Farmer & Bierman, 2002 ). Suboptimal social competence and poor social skills are also risk factors for peer rejection (Newcomb et al, 1993 ), social anxiety (Chen et al, 2020 ), and engagement in maladaptive behaviours (Palmer & Hollin, 1999 ; Stevenson & Goodman, 2001 ). In turn, children who tend to be more rejected or socially isolated have poorer physical and psychological health (Lacey et al, 2014 ; Lee et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldstein, Glick, and Gibbs (1998) considered aggressive behaviour to be associated with problem behaviours, such as inadequate emotional control, a limited range of social skills, and a combination of antisocial norms and values, and empirical evidence has been found to support this supposition. Compared with non-aggressive people, aggressive people have dysfunctions in perception (Akhtar & Bradley, 1991), attention (Lochman, White, & Wayland, 1991), attribution (Dodge, Price, Bachorowski, & Newman, 1990), cognition (Lochman & Dodge, 1994), emotion (Zamble & Quinsey, 1997), social competence (Hollin, 1990), and awareness of current norms and values (Nelson, Smith, & Dodd, 1990;Palmer & Hollin, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%