Uptake of predictive BRCA-mutation testing by first- and second-degree relatives is low. Emotional and behavioral factors of index patients are related to this uptake.

PURPOSE Ongoing care for patients with skin diseases can be optimized by understanding the incidence and population prevalence of various skin diseases and the patient-related factors related to the use of primary, specialty, and alternative health care for these conditions. We examined the recent prevalence of skin diseases in a defi ned population of family medicine patients, self-reported disease-related quality of life, extent and duration of skin disease, and the use of health care by patients with skin diseases. METHODSWe undertook a morbidity registry-based epidemiological study to determine the prevalence of various skin diseases, using a patient questionnaire to inquire about health care use, within a network of family practices in the Netherlands with a practice population of approximately 12,000 citizens.RESULTS Skin diseases accounted for 12.4% of all diseases seen by the participating family physicians. Of the 857 questionnaires sent to patients registered with a skin disease, 583 (68.0%) were returned, and 501 were suitable for analysis. In the previous year, 83.4% of the patients had contacted their family physician for their skin disease, 17.0% had contacted a medical specialist, and 5.2% had consulted an alternative health care practitioner. Overall, 65.1% contacted only their family physician. Patients who reported more severe disease and lower quality of life made more use of all forms of health care.CONCLUSION This practice population-based study found that skin diseases account for 12.4% of diseases seen by family physicians, and that some skin problems may be seen more frequently. Although patients with more extensive skin diseases also obtain care from dermatologists, most patients have their skin diseases treated mainly by their family physician. Overall, patients with more severe disease and a lower quality of life seek more treatment.

No abstract

The psychosocial well-being of patients with skin diseases in primary care is lower than that of the general population. Special attention has to be directed to those patients with lowered psychosocial well-being who might be at risk of developing severe psychosocial impairments such as clinical depression.

Two multidimensional health status instruments of rheumatic diseases, the Dutch-AIMS2 and the IRGL (Impact of Rheumatic diseases on General health and Lifestyle), were compared in a sample of 284 rheumatoid arthritis patients with regard to their measurement properties and usefulness for research purposes. Both questionnaires showed an excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha), and were highly comparable with regard to their construct and convergent validity. Second-order factor analysis confirmed the physical, psychological and social health dimensions for both questionnaires. The comparability between the instruments was established by high intercorrelations between the physical and psychological health dimensions. Sufficient convergent validity was indicated by the strong correlations between the physical functioning scales and clinical and laboratory measures. The main differences between both questionnaires relate to their length and emphasis on health aspects. The Dutch-AIMS2 is characterized by a more extensive assessment of the physical dimension and the additional measurement of general health aspects. The shorter IRGL exclusively assesses the main health dimensions with a more comprehensive measurement of the psychological and social dimensions. The instrument that reflects the subject in question most adequately should be chosen.