1966
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(66)80048-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social dominance in a herd of angus, hereford, and shorthorn cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This supported Hypothesis 5 and resembled the strict pecking orders of vertebrate competition structure (Wagnon et al 1966, Clutton-Brock et al 1979. Compared with similar (bryozoan) assemblages elsewhere the organisation of competition was the most hierarchical reported.…”
Section: Variability In Marine Benthic Community Structure With Latitudesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This supported Hypothesis 5 and resembled the strict pecking orders of vertebrate competition structure (Wagnon et al 1966, Clutton-Brock et al 1979. Compared with similar (bryozoan) assemblages elsewhere the organisation of competition was the most hierarchical reported.…”
Section: Variability In Marine Benthic Community Structure With Latitudesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The implications of intraspecific competition can also be quite different (Karlson 1980(Karlson , 1999 from those of interspecific interactions. Intraspecific encounters are common in specific niches like kelp blades (Stebbing 1973) or rocky shore zones (Connell 1961) where few species occur, or for mates between mobile animals (Wagnon et al 1966, Clutton-Brock et al 1979. The proportion of interspecific competition in the high arctic study assemblage was the lowest (20% of interactions) in any like group of competitors.…”
Section: Variability In Marine Benthic Community Structure With Latitudementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clashes between the encrusting animals of these southern polar communities rarely resulted in ties and the competitive dominant species overgrew any competitor encountered on virtually all occasions. Only in vertebrate intraspecific battles for status had such hierarchies previously been established (Clutton-Brock et al, 1979;Wagnon et al, 1996). There thus seems to be a latitudinal cline in the structure of competition, and therefore in the mechanism of succession in shallow marine environments (Barnes, 2002a).…”
Section: Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is no intrinsic reason for using transitivity in ranking, then it may be inappropriate. Alternative methods of ranking using relationships that do not involve transitivity of dominance include simple indices such as the proportion of opponents encountered that are beaten (Wagnon et al 1966) and more complex indices that take into account success of opponents (Wei 1952;Kendall 1955;Clutton-Brock et al 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%