Debating the End of Yugoslavia 2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315576039-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Inequalities and the Study of Yugoslavia’s Dissolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their efforts dovetail with those of social and cultural historians, who have sought to render more complex scholarly understandings of actually existing Yugoslav socialism. This work examines the realities and myths of worker self‐management (see Archer and Musić 2017; Calori and Jurkat 2018; Cvek 2017); tensions within socialist‐era redistributive politics (see Archer 2014); and the rise of nationalism among the Yugoslavian working class (Musić 2013). In addition to becoming a site of scholarly interest, (post‐)socialist industrialism has also emerged as a new object of popular nostalgia (see Petrović 2013, 2017).…”
Section: Violences Of Privatizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their efforts dovetail with those of social and cultural historians, who have sought to render more complex scholarly understandings of actually existing Yugoslav socialism. This work examines the realities and myths of worker self‐management (see Archer and Musić 2017; Calori and Jurkat 2018; Cvek 2017); tensions within socialist‐era redistributive politics (see Archer 2014); and the rise of nationalism among the Yugoslavian working class (Musić 2013). In addition to becoming a site of scholarly interest, (post‐)socialist industrialism has also emerged as a new object of popular nostalgia (see Petrović 2013, 2017).…”
Section: Violences Of Privatizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state controlled and driven economy aimed at full employment, which meant that large industrial complexes employed thousands of citizens (Petak, 2005). Although ‘the prized position of the working class and notions of social equality represented pivotal tropes in Yugoslav socialism and served to legitimise the state project’, inequalities obviously existed, especially in rural areas (Archer, 2014: 135).…”
Section: Poverty In Serbiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the period of transformation within the SEE, in addition to the influence of international organisations, the legacies, local parties, existing socio‐economic structures, skills, ethnicity, gender and other agencies and structures have also played a role (e.g., Deacon & Stubbs, ; Inglot, ; Stambolieva, ). Recent research on ex‐Yugoslavia has pointed to the significance of self‐management's legacy of stratification between the bureaucratic class and the rest of society, and between the urban and rural populations (Archer, ; Archer, Duda, & Stubbs, ; Ströhle, ). This legacy dimension is significant since, as Power Resource Theory (PRT) emphasises, political parties, as central mobilising actors in democratic conflicts, have themselves originated from social stratification throughout history (Korpi, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%