2023
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social inequalities in aggravating factors of somatic symptom persistence (SOMA.SOC): study protocol for a mixed-method observational study focusing on irritable bowel syndrome and fatigue

Abstract: IntroductionSome studies indicate that persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are more prevalent among individuals with a low socioeconomic status (SES) and a migration background. However, factors explaining social inequalities in PSS are largely unknown. It is expected that aggravating factors of PSS like illness perception, illness beliefs (health literacy, stigma), illness behaviour and health anxiety may play an important role for this explanation. The SOMA.SOC study will examine social inequalities (according… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample size calculation was based on a vignette design applied in the study. For details, please see the published study protocol ( 24 ). In the present analyses, the vignettes were not used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sample size calculation was based on a vignette design applied in the study. For details, please see the published study protocol ( 24 ). In the present analyses, the vignettes were not used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey is part of a large interdisciplinary project on persistence of somatic symptoms. The framework and study design of the Research Unit 5211 “Persistent SOMAtic Symptoms ACROSS Diseases: From Risk Factors to Modification (SOMACROSS)” and the subproject “Social Inequalities in Aggravating Factors of Persistent Somatic Symptoms (SOMA.SOC)” have been described in detail in the published study protocols ( 24 , 36 ). The study was approved by the Ethics Commission of the Hamburg Medical Chamber (No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%