1942
DOI: 10.1037/h0062402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social influence in the formation of enduring preferences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some studies find girls to be more responsive than boys to peer models of food acceptance (Hendy & Raudenbush, 2000), whereas others report no gender differences (Marinho, 1942;Birch, 1980). Some research suggests that older models are effective (Duncker, 1938;Brody & Stoneman, 1981), but other research finds no age effects except that child models of food acceptance are more effective than adult models (Marihno, 1942;Hendy & Raudenbush, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, some studies find girls to be more responsive than boys to peer models of food acceptance (Hendy & Raudenbush, 2000), whereas others report no gender differences (Marinho, 1942;Birch, 1980). Some research suggests that older models are effective (Duncker, 1938;Brody & Stoneman, 1981), but other research finds no age effects except that child models of food acceptance are more effective than adult models (Marihno, 1942;Hendy & Raudenbush, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although the effectiveness of peer models has been evaluated in a number of other contexts (Schunk, 1987;Harris, 1995), surprisingly little experimental research has been conducted on the use of trained peer models to influence food acceptance of children during preschool lunch (Birch, 1980;Brody & Stoneman, 1981;Hendy & Raudenbush, 2000) or during other preschool contexts such as story time (Duncker, 1938;Marinho, 1942).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children's preferences shifted (a) after being exposed to peers who exhibited preferences which differed from their own or (b) after they had heard a story featuring a hero who expressed a strong preference for a particular food. Marinho (1942) demonstrated that such social effects were greater and more persistent in the case of foods for which the children did not have a strong initial preference. In a study conducted with children aged 1-2 and 3-4 years by Harper & Sanders (1975), where each child observed his (or her) mother and a stranger eating a particular food, subjects' eating behaviours were more influenced by their mothers than by the strangers, and the changes were greater when the children observed a food being eaten (by mother or stranger) rather than simply having the food presented to them.…”
Section: O D E L L I N Gmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Early studies by Duncker (1938) showed that children preferred a food if it was chosen by admired others, and Duncker (1938) and Marinho (1942) showed that children would prefer a food that was preferred by a fictional hero. More systematic investigations by Leann Birch and her colleagues followed on this early work.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 98%