Social innovation and public service: A literature review of multi-actor collaborative approaches in five European countries

Merlin-Brogniart, Céline; Fuglsang, Lars; Magnussen, Siv; Peralta, Alberto; Révész, Éva; Rønning, Rolf; Rubalcaba, Luis; Scupola, Ada

doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121826

Cited by 24 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The ability of urban regeneration efforts to incorporate various stakeholder groups is the second criterion. The involvement of citizens, academics, and private, civic, and public players is considered a necessary part of the collaboration [130,131]. In accordance with studies on partnerships involving multiple stakeholders, the heterogeneity of involvement in regeneration activities plays a crucial role.…”

Section: The Project Is Running As the Renovation Is Partially Developedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional Collective Actions for Culture and Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutional collective actions (ICAs) provide a fascinating framework for comprehending collaborative urban initiatives. We defined ICAs as groups of people and organizations working together to promote a shared goal they could not pursue on their own. This study provides an empirical justification of why particular characteristics support the success of ICAs and why others fail. We restrict our analysis to culture-and-heritage-led urban regeneration initiatives and analyze the combinations of conditions under which these initiatives achieve their objectives. Adopting an integrated strategy, we studied prerequisites and critical elements that affect the success of collaborative actions, such as entrepreneurship, the enabling role of institutional capacity, multi-stakeholder involvement, and co-governance. Therefore, we compared sixteen culture-and-heritage-led urban regeneration initiatives in Europe as examples of ICAs in the urban context. We utilized fsQCA, fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, as a method that enabled us to define the configurations (combinations of factors) that determine the performances of urban regeneration actions. The results demonstrate that a variety of elements are necessary for developing collaborative initiatives and that three different recipes can be developed. In addition, this study contributes to the body of knowledge on institutional collective actions in two ways: (1) by providing empirical evidence of why specific conditions need to be considered when developing collective actions and (2) by showing how specific conditions interact and explain the performance of ICAs.

show abstract

Section: The Project Is Running As the Renovation Is Partially Developedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional Collective Actions for Culture and Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hasonlóan kiterjedt a társadalmi, a zöld és az ökoinnovációkkal foglalkozó átfogó irodalomkutatások köre. Ezek zömmel a társadalmi innovációkra koncentrálnak (Dionisio & de Vargas, 2020;Merlin-Brogniart et al, 2022;Ziegler et al, 2022), de a zöld innovációk terén is találhatók szakirodalmi összefoglaló alapművek (Hojnik & Ruzzier, 2016;Karimi Takalo et al, 2018).…”

Section: Néhány úJabb áLtalános Trendunclassified

Az innovációmenedzsment-kutatások térbeli és időbeli szerkezetének változása 1975 és 2021 között

Forman¹,

Kása²

2022

Külgazdaság

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Az innováció mára a gazdaság minden területén és az üzleti élet minden vonatkozásában megkerülhetetlenné vált. A termék- és folyamatfejlesztés, a piacbővítés és a fogyasztók hatékonyabb kielégítése mellett innovációnak tekinthető az új szabályoknak és előírásoknak való megfelelés, továbbá azok az operatív és stratégiai változtatások és fejlesztések, amelyek a szervezet és érintettjei számára bármilyen pozíciójavulással járnak. Jelen cikk témája bizonyítékok gyűjtése az innováció fogalmi bővülésére a szakirodalom minél szélesebb körű feltérképezésével és adatbányászati módszeren alapuló áttekintésével, illetve e fogalmi bővülés folyamatának a leírása. Ehhez a tudományos szakirodalomban 1975 és 2021 között megjelent mintegy 75 ezer cikket vetettek alá a szerzők az általuk kifejlesztett algoritmusnak, hogy a címekben és absztraktokban szereplő szavak, szókapcsolatok kinyerésével egyrészt időbeli tendenciákat lehessen azonosítani, másrészt a szerzők kutatóhelyi adataiból a térbeli átrendeződés trendjeit is láthatóvá lehessen tenni. A kutatás egyik fő következtetése, hogy az innováció értelmezésében egyre inkább a holisztikus megközelítések kerülnek előtérbe: az innováció mára már nem csupán egy funkcionális vállalati területen végrehajtott fejlesztés, hanem a vállalat határain messze túlnyúló komplex megközelítés a fenntarthatóbb jólét irányába.

show abstract

“…Taking these perspectives seriously, such processes necessarily imply practices of valuation, because changing, establishing, replacing, or adjusting established practices requires interpretations, collective judgement, and sensemaking. While a number of contributions demonstrate time-spatial dynamics of ruralbased social innovation processes [1,4,5], highlighting their collaborative character [6][7][8], less attention has been paid to how novelty and newness, as well as their potential impact, are collectively discussed, negotiated, made sense of, interpreted, and eventually applied or rejected.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Valuation in Rural Social Innovation Processes—Analysing Micro-Impact of a Collaborative Community in Southern Italy

Ammaturo,

Schmidt

2024

Societies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social innovation has been associated with contributing to ‘valuable’ rural development; however, usually, the impact of social innovation has been identified in the aftermath of its development or implementation. This might be too narrow an approach, as an ongoing social innovation process in itself may already lead to effects that contribute to regional and social changes in a local community and beyond. This paper argues that collaborative valuation processes are embedded in social innovation processes, generating effects that contribute to rural development. Focusing on a case study that exemplifies social innovation processes in agriculture and food production carried out by a rural collaborative community in southern Italy, we demonstrate how three valuation phases, such as contestations and negotiations of norms, symbolic capital accumulation and recognition of actions, as well as re-definitions of values, impact community development through joint sense-making, empowerment and societal change. Our empirical results suggest the close intertwining of both social innovation and valuation processes. The empirical results demonstrate how collective valuation processes have micro-effects on the agro-economic system, on local socio-cultural processes, and on place-making activities. Methodologically, this paper builds on ethnographic methods, including participatory observations, semi-structured interviews, oral histories, and socio-spatial analysis investigating moments of valuation embedded in daily collaborative practices.

show abstract

Social innovation and public service: A literature review of multi-actor collaborative approaches in five European countries

Cited by 24 publications

References 41 publications

Institutional Collective Actions for Culture and Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Institutional Collective Actions for Culture and Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Az innovációmenedzsment-kutatások térbeli és időbeli szerkezetének változása 1975 és 2021 között

Valuation in Rural Social Innovation Processes—Analysing Micro-Impact of a Collaborative Community in Southern Italy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About