2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social interaction effect of rotational grazing and its policy implications for sustainable use of grassland: Evidence from pastoral areas in Inner Mongolia and Gansu, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vegetation changes in the Xilin Gol League have the following characteristics: (1) The study area has obvious greening as a whole, but the greening degree is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vegetation changes in the Xilin Gol League have the following characteristics: (1) The study area has obvious greening as a whole, but the greening degree is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grassland is the largest ecosystem in China, occupying 40% of China's land area [1]. The grassland ecosystem has many ecological functions, such as water conservation, organic matter production, and nutrient recycling [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pastoral areas, grazing methods are transformed from prohibition to sustainable grazing methods, such as rotational grazing and balanced grazing. Continuously improving grazing methods are also pushed through policy incentives [51,52].…”
Section: Planning and Implications In Agricultural And Pastoral Manag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compensating herdsmen who stop grazing in prohibited areas (including grasslands that were severely degraded and highly valued in water conservation and grassland protected areas); rewarding herdsmen who reduced their grazed livestock according to grassland productivity; subsidizing for production machinery, fine grass seeds, and livestock breeds. [40,47,48] Note: in the first column, RGLG means Returning Grazing Land to Grassland, FLB means Forage-Livestock Balance, HSP means Herdsmen Settlement Project, and SISGC means Subsidy and Incentive System for Grassland Conservation.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%