2013
DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2013.821854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social justice and education in the public and private spheres

Abstract: This paper explores the complex relationship between social justice and education in the public and private spheres. The politics of education is often presented as a battle between left and right, the state and the market. In this representation, the public and the private spheres are neatly aligned on either side of the line of battle, and social justice is commonly seen as the prerogative of the public sphere. This paper challenges this representation. It shows how the language of what counts as public and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Families' reasons for choosing private or religious schools and the impact of school choice on both educational outcomes and equity are hotly debated in the literature (see, for example, Ashley et al 2014;Tooley and Longfield 2015). The debate is often linked to political arguments around the role of the state and privatization (Henig 1995;Power and Taylor 2013).…”
Section: Global Literature On School Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families' reasons for choosing private or religious schools and the impact of school choice on both educational outcomes and equity are hotly debated in the literature (see, for example, Ashley et al 2014;Tooley and Longfield 2015). The debate is often linked to political arguments around the role of the state and privatization (Henig 1995;Power and Taylor 2013).…”
Section: Global Literature On School Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question that remains is whether or not the concept of privatization encompasses the various frameworks and relations involving the public and private domains including the State, market agents, organized civil society or the third sector. This is complicated by the fact that there are no clear-cut definitive features or dividing lines separating the "public" from the "private" (Barroso, 2013) since they both depend on socio-political processes (Power & Taylor, 2013) that include the recent expansion of privatization and the opening of spaces for the influence and benefit of private actors in education. Nevertheless, these relations, discussed by some authors as based on the concept of 'permeability', do take on observable patterns in accordance with "certain historic, socio-political and economic conditions": conceptions of the State and its role, functions and responsibilities to society and citizens, the pathways shaping certain policies, the dominant economic formulae and trends or the democratic interplay of political actors (Tripodi & Sousa, 2018, p. 234).…”
Section: Global Trends: Governance Managerialism and Educational Inementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other things being equal, a community is better off if it has lower unemployment rates, higher median income, lower crime rates, lower percentages of foreclosed homes, and a higher median price for its housing stock (Sharkey, 2014). We considered that having higher levels of state or national giving signaled more resources being available to support children (Power & Taylor, 2013). Consequently, an upward trend in national giving is associated with higher levels of educational opportunities.…”
Section: Elements Of the Expanded Environmental Scanmentioning
confidence: 99%