Social learning in planning: Seattle's sustainable development codebooks

Holden, Meg

doi:10.1016/j.progress.2007.12.001

Cited by 60 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This sort of collaborative process allows identification or development of indicators to be a learning process for all Holden, 2008;Oldenhuizing et al, 2013). As Holden (2006) states, the indicators serve as the beginning of a conversation about what to do.…”

Section: Who Develops Selects and Prioritises Indicators?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Prioritising indicators of cumulative socio-economic impacts to characterise rapid development of onshore gas resources

Uhlmann

Rifkin

Everingham

et al. 2014

The Extractive Industries and Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Who Develops Selects and Prioritises Indicators?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Prioritising indicators of cumulative socio-economic impacts to characterise rapid development of onshore gas resources

Uhlmann

Rifkin

Everingham

et al. 2014

The Extractive Industries and Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Other populations, however, benefit from distribution into economically diverse neighborhoods. Integration provides, but does not coerce, diverse social groups with an opportunity for "social learning" [42]. This basic strategy was implemented in Austin by GNDC, a local affordable housing provider, as early as the 1980s.…”

Section: Distributed Housing Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

Units of Production and Consumption: Reframing Social Housing as Sustainable Infrastructure

Moore

2014

Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social housing in the United States is generally viewed as an unfortunate, yet necessary public entitlement required to keep poor citizens from becoming burdens in other ways to the more affluent citizens who pay taxes. This view derives from the utilitarian philosophical assumptions that are the basis of the US Constitution itself. This article reframes public understanding of social housing, without leaving our utilitarian framework, as an essential part of sustainable urban infrastructure. This transformation requires a three-step process that is ecological, social, and technical in scope, or ecosociotechnical.Step one is to revisit our utilitarian assumptions in order to reconsider the meaning of the "greatest-good" principle. Reconsidering dominant socioeconomic assumptions that guide the generally unsuccessful approach to social housing in the United States, of which building energy systems are a part, requires a revised problem statement.Step two requires reframing the concept of infrastructure to be the endproduct of our building culture rather than the enabling means of urban life. Finally, step three requires reframing social housing so that it is better understood, and therefore designed to be reciprocal units of production rather than only units of consumption-units of providing rather than only units of receiving. In this final section, an on-going case study demonstrates how net-zero energy social housing might provide the ecosociotechnical goods required to sustain cities. The consequences of this analysis for energy studies are significant because they require energy system designers, policy-makers, and managers to consider the social as well as the purely technical dimensions of energy flows.

show abstract

“…Das Konzept der Wissensordnung verweist auf eine besondere stabilität in der hierarchie der Wissensformen, aus der sich auch Pfadabhängigkeiten ableiten ließen. Der rekurs auf Wissen ermöglicht es indes gerade, auf Prozesse des Wandels und der innovation aufmerksam zu machen, die auf Veränderun-gen von Wissensbeständen durch kollektives lernen zurück-gehen (Oppen/strassheim 2006;holden 2008).…”

Section: Kollektive Wissensordnungenunclassified

Der veränderte Stellenwert von Wissen in der Planung

Zimmermann

2010

RuR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Wissen ist trotz zunehmender Bedeutung für die raum-und regionalentwicklung bisher keine zentrale Kategorie der Planung. Mit dem Beitrag wird das Ziel verfolgt, auf die relevanz verschiedener Wissensformen für Planungsprozesse aufmerksam zu machen. Dazu wird auf sozialwissenschaftliche ansätze zurückgegriffen, um konzeptionelle Überlegungen zur Wissensverwendung in Planungsprozessen zu entwickeln. Dies kann einen Beitrag zum besseren Verständnis von Planungsprozessen leisten und bietet in diesem sinne einen ansatzpunkt für weiterführende planungstheoretische Überlegungen.Schlüsselwörter Wissen · Planung · expertenwissen · lokales Wissen · entscheidungsprozesseThe Changing Significance of Knowledge in Planning a contribution to a Knowledge-Based Understanding of Planning Abstract Knowledge emerged as a relevant category in spatial development but gained less attention in the planning literature. this paper seeks to raise interest for the diverse forms of knowledge that are relevant for spatial planning. it is based on concepts from the social sciences, and a conception of knowledge application in planning processes is developed. These reflections allow for different way of thinking about planning and open new opportunities for theory development in planning.Keywords Knowledge · Planning · expert knowledge · local knowledge · Decision-making raumforsch raumordn (2010) 68:115-125 Die arbeiten an diesem Beitrag wurden durch eine förderung im rahmen des lOeWe-schwerpunkts "eigenlogik der städte" an der technischen Universität Darmstadt ermöglicht. Die argumentation geht zudem auf ein eU-forschungsprojekt zurück, das unter Beteiligung des autors von 2006 bis 2009 durchgeführt wurde (atkinson/terizakis/Zimmermann 2010).

show abstract

Social learning in planning: Seattle's sustainable development codebooks

Cited by 60 publications

References 36 publications

Prioritising indicators of cumulative socio-economic impacts to characterise rapid development of onshore gas resources

Prioritising indicators of cumulative socio-economic impacts to characterise rapid development of onshore gas resources

Units of Production and Consumption: Reframing Social Housing as Sustainable Infrastructure

Der veränderte Stellenwert von Wissen in der Planung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About