2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11424-014-1195-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social learning with time-varying weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall from the previous section that replacing IIA with separability results in a learning rule according to which agent i linearly combines the beliefs of her neighbors j ∈ N i with weights a ijt > 0. Our next result, which generalizes the main result of Jadbabaie et al (2012) and proves a conjecture of Liu et al (2014), characterizes the conditions under which such a learning rule leads to the long-run aggregation of information.…”
Section: Degroot Learningsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall from the previous section that replacing IIA with separability results in a learning rule according to which agent i linearly combines the beliefs of her neighbors j ∈ N i with weights a ijt > 0. Our next result, which generalizes the main result of Jadbabaie et al (2012) and proves a conjecture of Liu et al (2014), characterizes the conditions under which such a learning rule leads to the long-run aggregation of information.…”
Section: Degroot Learningsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…To establish (31), we follow an approach similar to Liu et al (2014). Applying part (d) of Lemma A.2 to (28) implies that…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize that the proposed learning rule given by Algorithm 1 does not employ any form of "belief-averaging". This feature is in stark contrast with existing approaches to distributed hypothesis testing that rely either on linear opinion pooling [4][5][6], or log-linear opinion pooling [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. As such, the lack of linearity in our belief update rule precludes (direct or indirect) adaptation of existing analysis techniques to suit our needs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Notably, finite-time concentration results are derived in [9][10][11], and a large-deviation analysis is conducted in [12,13] for a broad class of distributions that generate the agents' observation profiles. Extensions to different types of time-varying graphs have also been considered in [6,[8][9][10][11]. In a recent paper [15], the authors go beyond specific functional forms of belief-update rules and, instead, adopt an axiomatic framework that identifies the fundamental factors responsible for social learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In social learning models, individuals engage in communication with their neighbors in order to learn from their experiences. For more details, we refer readers to see [7]- [9]. A large amount of papers concerning consensus algorithms have been published [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], most of which focused on the average principle,i.e., the current state of each agent is an average of the previous states of its own and its neighbors, which is implemented by communication between agents and can be described by the following difference equations for the discrete-time cases:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%