2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social licensing and mining in South Africa: Reflections from community protests at a mining site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dreze and Sen (1999) opine that economic development means the freedom to live to the fullest. It is the state when individuals are allowed to develop as per their potential and capacities (Odhiambo, 2009; Mahadea and Kaseeram, 2018; Matebesi and Marais, 2018).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dreze and Sen (1999) opine that economic development means the freedom to live to the fullest. It is the state when individuals are allowed to develop as per their potential and capacities (Odhiambo, 2009; Mahadea and Kaseeram, 2018; Matebesi and Marais, 2018).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Mahadea, 2001; Mago, 2013; Mago and Toro, 2013; Manaliyo and Muzindutsi, 2013; Mago and Chitokwindo, 2014; Mukorera and Mahadea, 2014; Manaliyo, 2016; Marais, 2016; Mahadea and Kaseeram, 2018; Matebesi and Marais, 2018)…”
Section: Data Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major stakeholders are local communities, mining companies, and the central government (McMahon and Remy, 2001). Besides negative impacts, local economic benefits, job creation, rehabilitation of the mined land, community engagement, and funding are some expectations of local communities from mining companies (Matebesi and Marais, 2018). Many countries require social cost-benefit analysis for legal permissions of proposed mines (Damigos, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These negative impacts cause conflicts over mines all over the World. Examples include conflicts between mining activities and the environmental protection in China (Li et al, 2015), conflicts between various stakeholders because of interference in the natural environment and health impacts in Poland (Gorniak-Zimroz and Pactwa, 2018), conflicts between mining companies and mining communities in South Africa (Matebesi and Marais, 2018). The major stakeholders are local communities, mining companies, and the central government (McMahon and Remy, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 Similarly, there has been a sustained increase in the number of reported conflict incidents between mining companies and mining-affected communities in South Africa. 16 The literature reveals that since South African mining laws do not require the government to share mining agreements with the public, it engenders high levels of secrecy around such dealings. Consequently, the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (MPRDA), 17 encouraged the exclusion of beneficiary mining-affected communities from participation in natural resource governance decisions that directly affected them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%