2016
DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2015.1113230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media and counterterrorism strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boko Haram, for example, is one of the radical groups that have a Twitter account to offer radical discourse and violence, which are part of their ideology (Chiluwa 2015). Although in various countries there has been a de-radicalization, it is not an easy problem (Aistrope 2016). As many as 31% of respondents claimed to access radical sites because they were interested in exploring the radical ideology they knew, and 10.3% claimed they were interested in exploring radical sites to study the aims of radical movements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boko Haram, for example, is one of the radical groups that have a Twitter account to offer radical discourse and violence, which are part of their ideology (Chiluwa 2015). Although in various countries there has been a de-radicalization, it is not an easy problem (Aistrope 2016). As many as 31% of respondents claimed to access radical sites because they were interested in exploring the radical ideology they knew, and 10.3% claimed they were interested in exploring radical sites to study the aims of radical movements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Islamic State’s sophisticated use of media has led to increased focus on the perceptual and virtual dimensions of contemporary wars. ‘Information warfare’, ‘strategic communication’ and ‘propaganda war’ have returned to the lips of policymakers and strategists from Washington to Brussels, and numerous counter-communication initiatives have been introduced (Aistrope, 2016). These initiatives call for academic scrutiny for the following two reasons: first, because there is currently little research on the effectiveness of these types of campaigns; and, second, because it is not unthinkable that the initiatives may have (damaging) consequences beyond their immediate aim of countering the Islamic State’s communication, particularly related to questions about freedom of speech/censorship and diversity/normalization — because how do you counter propaganda without becoming a propagandist yourself?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, these documents increased to 68, encompassing several topics related to social media and terrorism. These topics included the strategies to combat terrorism (Aistrope, 2016), information extremism incidents (Brajawidagda et al, 2016), and the use of social media by terrorists, to expand their global influence (Weimann, 2016). Furthermore, the number of published documents improved to 84 in 2017, based on detecting and combating terrorism on social media platforms, such as Twitter (Debnath et al, 2017;Gialampoukidis et al, 2017a,b;Sraieb-Koepp, 2017).…”
Section: International Published Documents On Social Media and Terror...mentioning
confidence: 99%