2016
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media: Friends with patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 A recent letter to the BDJ suggests that about one third of dentists responding to a small poll were willing to accept friend requests from patients on Facebook. 43…”
Section: Consent and Legal Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 A recent letter to the BDJ suggests that about one third of dentists responding to a small poll were willing to accept friend requests from patients on Facebook. 43…”
Section: Consent and Legal Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 14 In fact, there is an ongoing debate within the BDJ on the impact and significance of social media on dentistry and dental professionalism. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] While a lot of research has been conducted on the online behaviours of medical and allied health professional students (see above), less has been undertaken on dental students, except for Kenny and Johnson 22 and Nason et al 23 Mindful of this gap in our knowledge, this research was conducted to explore the social media habits of dental students and their views on e-professionalism. Its aim was to determine whether students were aware of the standards set by the GDC regarding social media and whether they believed they were being professional in their online activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdelkarim and Sullivan 25 Arnett et al 31 Beebe et al 0 Brown 34 Jorgensen 38 De Groote et al 27 Gonzalez and Gadbury Amyot 23 Haas and Park 33 Hamm et al 32 Hatch et al 46 Hughes 37 Khatoon et al 24,29 Kothari et al 22 Levin 39 McAndrew and Johnston 47 Meerschaert 40 Perel 58 Risk 41 Snyman and Visser 28 Spallek et al 43 Stein et al 45 Hancocks 54 Oakley and Spallek 48 Peltier and Curley 55 Roucka et al 52 Affleck and Macnish 50 Chan 57 Drone 35 Foster 53 Henry and Pieren 26 Henry 36 Khatoon et al 44 Mc Crory and Jacobs 5 Neville and Waylen 51 Parkinson and Turner Schafer 56 Spallek et al 42…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%