2017
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v22i11.7866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media, science communication and the academic super user in the United Kingdom

Abstract: The Internet and social media tools have created new opportunities for open science including communicating in more interactive ways and sharing research data. Drawing on evidence from interviews and a survey of academics in the United Kingdom our research suggests that most scholars recognised the value and importance of more open science communication and data sharing, but many had concerns about the potential risks. A small group, who can be termed super users, were frequently communicating updates of their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our study complement the findings of Y. Zhu and K. Purdam (2017), F. Ren and J. Zhai (2013), F. Papanelopoulou, A. Nieto-Galan and E. Perdiguero (2009) through the results of the identification of the practice of popularizing scientific knowledge in the well-known Russian popular science magazines and examples of the use in this process of editorial sites and resources in social networks. The obtained results also supplement the studies of Z. Pavic, A. Sundalic (2017), A.S. Scherer (2010), M.M.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results of our study complement the findings of Y. Zhu and K. Purdam (2017), F. Ren and J. Zhai (2013), F. Papanelopoulou, A. Nieto-Galan and E. Perdiguero (2009) through the results of the identification of the practice of popularizing scientific knowledge in the well-known Russian popular science magazines and examples of the use in this process of editorial sites and resources in social networks. The obtained results also supplement the studies of Z. Pavic, A. Sundalic (2017), A.S. Scherer (2010), M.M.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…While these issues are well understood, the research community knows little about longitudinal aspects of scholars’ social media use (Veletsianos, Kimmons, Belikov, & Johnson, ). For instance, while some note that a common reason for heavy social media use is scholars’ perception that using social media is advantageous to advance their career (Kieslinger, ; Zhu & Purdam, ), there is little evidence in the literature examining the longitudinal relationship between social media use and career progression.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These social bonds have both an informal nature and a professional side to enhance collaboration among researchers (Nentwich and König, 2014). SNS support a wide range of activities ranging from collaborating on content, planning meetings (Nández and Borrego, 2013), and sharing data (Zhu and Purdam, 2017) to the exchange and testing of ideas and collaborative editing of articles prior to submission to academic journals (Darling, et al, 2013). However, although these sites are designed to support bidirectional and multidirectional communications between users, most researchers appear to use them in a unidirectional way (Jia, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%