Social media screening and content effects: implications for job applicant reactions

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to pursue several goals: first, what is the relationship between perceived respect for privacy and potential job pursuit of student applicants in a hypothetical application scenario which includes social media screening as part of the selection process? Second, if the job involves vulnerable others, what are the implications for privacy perceptions? And third, to what extent does the use of social media for non-work purposes relate to perceived respect for privacy? Design/methodology/approach Using a cross-sectional sampling approach, data were collected from 388 student participants in two different data collection rounds via an online survey. Findings Perceived respect for privacy was positively correlated, and information privacy concern was negatively correlated, with job pursuit intention. However, perceived respect for privacy differed across the different jobs. Specifically, respect for privacy was higher when the employer screened social media for jobs involving explicit work with children. Social media use and content effects also emerged. Those who either observed others online or interacted with others online to socialize reported lower respect for privacy. Participants with more sensitive content online and content they would be unwilling to share also reported lower scores for privacy. Research limitations/implications The results were based on cross-sectional data, correlational analyses and hypothetical job scenarios due to ethical considerations and causal restrictions in what may be bi-directional effects. Originality/value The current study adds to the limited research on the negative effects of social media screening by employers on applicant reactions and the role of job-specifics on how applicant may react to screening.

Job seekers' attitudes toward cybervetting: Scale development, validation, and platform comparison

“…It is possible that applicants have strong opinions toward specific actions (e.g., screening friends/followers list) that could provide more useful information for practitioners than ATC as a whole. Jeske and Shultz (2019) recently showed that participants had less of an issue with privacy invasion when cybervetting was used for jobs involving childcare or government security. As such, future research could explore whether ATC vary depending on specific practices or the job being applied for.…”

Cybervetting prospective employees of SMEs

“…Furthermore, when SNSs screening is transparent, the candidates are less likely to perceive the selection procedure as unfair, which will reduce their intention to withdraw from employment selection (Suen, 2018). Perceived respect for privacy is positively correlated, and information privacy concern is negatively correlated, with job pursuit intention (Jeske & Shultz, 2019). In this context, it should be stressed that the company's internal potential is most strongly influenced by the potential and commitment of its employees that can be directly influenced by the individual activities of human resources management (Stachová et al, 2019).…”

The impact of self-esteem, conscientiousness and pseudo-personality on technostress

“…This study contributes to current technostress research by further examining antecedents, and by focusing on the role of personality. In addition, we examined how differences in "self" and "observer" ratings of personality characteristics may point to variations in the way individuals (Jeske andShultz, 2019, Korzynski et al, 2020). Due to COVID-19, most people are now obliged to use ICTs at work to communicate internally (e.g., Zoom, Microsoft Teams) or externally (e.g., LinkedIn,…”