2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social network clustering and consensus-based distrust behaviors management for large-scale group decision-making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the defects in the proffered method, future works will develop the research of uncertain decision methods and applications from the following aspects: (1) propose several novel Fermatean fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar operators by combining power average operators, Muirhead mean and partitioned Hamy Mean Operators; (2) explore and discuss some novel information measures such as dissimilar measures, knowledge measures and divergence measures to support Fermatean fuzzy decision analysis; (3) utilize the proposed group-decision method to address some realistic decision methods such as sustainable supply chain [ 64 ], emergency scheme assessment [ 65 ] and solid waste management [ 66 ]; (4) construct a large-scale group-decision-making model based on consensus reaching [ 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Results Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the defects in the proffered method, future works will develop the research of uncertain decision methods and applications from the following aspects: (1) propose several novel Fermatean fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar operators by combining power average operators, Muirhead mean and partitioned Hamy Mean Operators; (2) explore and discuss some novel information measures such as dissimilar measures, knowledge measures and divergence measures to support Fermatean fuzzy decision analysis; (3) utilize the proposed group-decision method to address some realistic decision methods such as sustainable supply chain [ 64 ], emergency scheme assessment [ 65 ] and solid waste management [ 66 ]; (4) construct a large-scale group-decision-making model based on consensus reaching [ 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Results Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, different fuzzy linguistic environments and MCDM methods can be applied to this research model. Thirdly, in the face of decision-making experts from different fields, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the preference information provided by different experts, and small-group-decision-making cannot fully ensure the credibility of the final decision-making results; therefore, it is a hot issue to establish a large-scale group consensus decision-making model [45][46][47] in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment and solve the actual group-decision-making problem combined with big data artificial intelligence technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the proposed model could be adapted to deal with this new kind of decision-making problem. Second, intuitionistic reciprocal preference relations have been assumed, but other type of preference relations as, for example, fuzzy hesitant preference relations, which allow to model the decision-maker' s hesitancy, could be used [41,42] . Hence, the proposed model could be extended to deal with this kind of preference relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%