Social network participation towards enactment of self‐care in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A qualitative meta‐ethnography

Abstract

Background How people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) engage with supportive social networks to enhance self‐care is not understood. The personal rationales for participation in socially directed support have not been addressed in the literature. To determine how people with COPD identify, engage and participate in socially supportive self‐care practices, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐ethnography of qualitative studies. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted between June 2010 and June 2021. Of 3536 articles, 8 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Using a meta‐ethnography approach to the qualitative synthesis, new concepts were derived from the data to identify aligning themes and develop a conceptual model. Findings Interpretations from the papers yielded concepts of (1) accountability and personal responsibility in self‐care, (2) valued positive relationships with clinicians, (3) understanding of illness through shared and personal experiences and (4) acknowledging social networks in fostering self‐care engagement in people with COPD. The independence‐experience (Index) model of synthesized (third order) interpretations highlighted the processes of social networks and self‐care practices: (a) fear or avoidance of dependency, (b) learning from experiences of adaptive self‐care behaviours and (c) including valued practices in self‐care. Self‐care strategies are formed through illness experiences and relatable social encounters. Conclusion The model derived from the third‐order interpretations is a framework to describe socially supported self‐care and can be used to direct future self‐care strategies and target interventions for people with COPD. Patient or Public Contribution The findings and model were presented to the long‐term conditions patient and public involvement group. The manuscript is coauthored by a public representative.

Towards evidence-based and inclusive models of peer support for long covid: A hermeneutic systematic review

“… Assari et al, 2018 , Carfì et al, 2020 , Evans et al, 2021 , Gillard, 2019 , Harkins et al, 2010 , Juul Nielsen and Grøn, 2012 , Ladds et al, 2020 , Mukku et al, 2012 , Ortona et al, 2021 , Rains and Keating, 2011 , Welch et al, 2021 …”

A Middle-Range Theory of Social Isolation in Chronic Illness

“…Evidence to directly support this proposition is lacking; however, we know that older people who are socially isolated are more likely to eat a poor diet and less likely to adhere to regular physical activity [ 48 ] than those who are not socially isolated. The reason may lie in the fact that one’s social network both increases the likelihood of receiving support for healthcare, as well as peer pressure to engage in health-promoting practices [ 49 ].…”

Unexpected benefits: reflections on virtual relationship building within public involvement during the Covid-19 pandemic

“…Several people volunteered to work with me on my research programme, and this continues outside of the coffee mornings. One public contributor reviews all project ideas, design, and analysis of qualitative data, and has recently contributed to a publication (Welch et al, 2021). More than 20 researchers have had further public interactions and/or public involvement activities as a direct result of their coffee morning session.…”