2019
DOI: 10.1093/afraf/ady067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social network research in Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This often entails the creation of a series of “fake dichotomies, oppositions and potential choices” of affiliation that “in fact spring from an extremely limited number of options” (De Boeck & Baloji 2016, 114). Not only is the shifting associational life of Dar es Salaam more ephemeral than it had previously been then, it is also more fragmented: as Kate Meagher (2010) articulates in the context of Nigeria, livelihood networks are increasingly “defined by an individual’s portfolio of ties, rather than by collective arrangements,” arguably serving to “exacerbate rather than reduce vulnerability” (Meagher 2009, 2; Marks & Stys 2019, 5–6).…”
Section: Associational Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This often entails the creation of a series of “fake dichotomies, oppositions and potential choices” of affiliation that “in fact spring from an extremely limited number of options” (De Boeck & Baloji 2016, 114). Not only is the shifting associational life of Dar es Salaam more ephemeral than it had previously been then, it is also more fragmented: as Kate Meagher (2010) articulates in the context of Nigeria, livelihood networks are increasingly “defined by an individual’s portfolio of ties, rather than by collective arrangements,” arguably serving to “exacerbate rather than reduce vulnerability” (Meagher 2009, 2; Marks & Stys 2019, 5–6).…”
Section: Associational Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, networks may play a positive role in the policy realm in LICs, where weak state capacity and opaque institutional processes may occur. Some scholars have asserted that those conditions lead networks to undermine development ( van de Walle, 2001 ) and ‘exacerbat[e] horizontal inequality, marginalization, and corruption’ ( Marks and Stys, 2019 ). Yet, in our specific case, network relations fostered the power needed to promote policies that provided the public good of increased mental health care and decreased stigma (Interviews 13, 15, 16, 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wielding power through networks may be more likely to occur in LICs because weak formal institutions and limited economic resources restrict the state’s exercise of power through laws or budgets. In the absence of state power, network power builds on societal norms of reciprocity and interdependence that shape decision-making ( Mkandawire, 2015 ; Marks and Stys, 2019 ). Network relations may be rooted in expertise, information and shared narratives, resources that can undergird power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power is an inherently relational concept. In recent times, relational analyses have become more prominent as a way to study politics (Marks and Stys 2019). While much of the literature has used the term ‘network’ metaphorically, few researchers have so far empirically studied patterns of elite interaction (Keller 2016; Osei 2018).…”
Section: Network Influence and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%