Social pathologies, false developments and the heteronomy of the social: Social theory and the negative side of recognition

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore a tension between two concepts designed to expose social discomforts in Axel Honneth's mature work, namely social pathologies and anomie. Particular emphasis will be given to how they contribute or obstruct Honneth's apprehension of social tensions. In the first session of this exposition I will show that Honneth's interpretation of social pathologies is based on a conception of society as an organic whole (I). While this interpretation represents a slight change regarding Honneth's understanding of social pathologies in Das Recht der Freiheit, it does not change the fact that in his work subsequent to that book the concept of false developments has not been properly theorized. Accordingly, social discomforts related to deviations from expected patterns of a normative reconstruction remain largely ignored. This calls for a perspective more fully able to grasp the heteronomy of social life (II). As a result, in Honneth's mature work there seems to be a tension between the aims of a normative reconstruction and those of social critique, mainly due to an inability of the author to combine both elements of his social theory. In its final section (III), the paper will address that tension in order to critically contribute to Honneth's attempt to link normative reconstruction, social analysis and criticism.

Crítica reconstrutiva do neoliberalismo

“…Isso, porém, ainda não é o suficiente para caracterizar uma crítica do neoliberalismo, compondo, antes um painel de crítica à tendência generalizada à privatização das relações pessoais e à atomização da ação política. Nesse ponto, a difícil relação entre patologias sociais e falsos desenvolvimentos (Souza 2017) cobra sua fatura da teoria honnethiana, uma vez que o autor não explicita o que seria a implementação parcial da liberdade -ou "a possibilidade da liberdade", como chamada no livro -e o que seriam falsos desenvolvimentos dentro de instituições assentadas sobre princípios de liberdade social -a "realidade da liberdade".…”