2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social perception in moral judgments of interpersonal transgressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Does the past misdeed likely foretell future transgressions? Observers can take numerous factors into account in judging a person's past deeds, including the type and severity of transgression committed, the circumstances of the offense, the perceived intent of the transgressor, and time that has passed since the transgression and their beliefs about the possibility of moral change (Adams, O'Connor & Belmi, 2022;Leith et al, 2014;McCullough et al, 2010;Ward & Wilson, 2015;Wohl & McGrath, 2007;Young & Saxe, 2011). In essence, the perceiver's moral calculus determines the balance between condemnation and redemption; whether to hold onto the past act as presently pertinent, or to forgive and forget.…”
Section: -Maya Angeloumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does the past misdeed likely foretell future transgressions? Observers can take numerous factors into account in judging a person's past deeds, including the type and severity of transgression committed, the circumstances of the offense, the perceived intent of the transgressor, and time that has passed since the transgression and their beliefs about the possibility of moral change (Adams, O'Connor & Belmi, 2022;Leith et al, 2014;McCullough et al, 2010;Ward & Wilson, 2015;Wohl & McGrath, 2007;Young & Saxe, 2011). In essence, the perceiver's moral calculus determines the balance between condemnation and redemption; whether to hold onto the past act as presently pertinent, or to forgive and forget.…”
Section: -Maya Angeloumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ефективність навчального процесу залежить від міжособової поведінки всіх його учасників [15]. Високоморальні судження, відповідальність, когнітивні упередження призводять до асиметрії в міжособистісній взаємодії [4], тоді як вона є джерелом значної соціальної інформації, що формує суспільне сприйняття [14]. Наявність міжособистісних проблем вважається можливим фактором ризику суїциду [11].…”
unclassified