Social Proximity and Environmental NGO Relationships in Corporate Sustainability Reports

Abstract

This study demonstrates how three Finnish companies constructed their stakeholder relationships with environmental NGOs (ENGOs) in terms of social proximity in their sustainability reports between 2003 and 2012. The study identifies five types of stakeholder relationship between ENGOs and corporations constructed in the reports: monetary, management system, collaborative, dialogue and conflicting. Within these relationships the level of constructed social proximity and level of trust vary. The results indicate that, within the 10 years we examined, a change has occurred in the ENGO relationships constructed in corporate sustainability reports: they have shifted from being nonstakeholder relationships to more socially proximate, collaborative ones. However, social proximity is primarily constructed through projects that have little or nothing to do with core business operations. Thus the construction of more socially proximate ENGO relationships is just one way a corporation can seek legitimacy for its environmental management.

Roles and drivers of agribusiness shaping Climate‐Smart Landscapes: A review

“…Second, analysis of reports focused on the ultimate goals of the reported activities , that is, whether the report focuses ultimately on economic and business goals as opposed to sustainability goals (Barkemeyer, Holt, Preuss, & Tsang, ). Third, scholars found important to assess the nature of the stakeholders engaged by the companies as per the activity descriptions in their reports, that is, whether socially proximate stakeholders are involved as opposed to conflicting stakeholders (Joensuu, Koskela, & Onkila, ). Finally, the description of how companies set up a monitoring of their activities and evaluation of their outcomes in collaboration with their stakeholders was found critical to understand potential for influencing sustainable development (Hoffrén & Apajalahti, ).…”

Strategic Sustainability Procedures: Focusing Business Strategic Planning on the Socio‐Ecological System in an Island Context

“…According to Joensuu et al . (, p. 26), ‘Sustainability reports have become one of the most important corporate responses to stakeholder demands’. However, it appears as though these actions are leading towards an accomplishment or ‘arrival’ (Ihlen and Roper, , p. 49) within the ‘walls’ of the organization.…”

Sustainable Development, Stakeholder Engagement and Analyst Forecasts’ Accuracy: Positive Evidence from the Spanish Setting

“…Some authors argue that CSR reporting should be understood under the framework of legitimacy theory, signal theory or within the reputation risk management process (Thorne et al , ) as well as within a cognitive perspective that also includes increased operational efficiency, branding and new market development (Hockerts, ). Especially in the aftermath of the financial crisis, voluntary non‐financial disclosures are also taken into account when making investment decisions (Cohen et al , ; Hu and Scholtens, ), as there is an increasing move to adopt social responsible investment decisions (Jansson and Biel, ; Weber et al , ; Thien, ; Kim, ) and the companies show social proximity (Joensuu et al , ). Wang and Tuttle () find that investors use CSR information to form an overall impression about management's credibility, which in turn has a positive impact on the share price or even on the company's return on equity (García‐Benau et al , ).…”