Social Quality and Health: Examining Individual and Neighbourhood Contextual Effects Using a Multilevel Modelling Approach

Abstract

Social quality focusses on the nature of ‘the social’, arguing that people are realised as social beings through interacting with a range of collectives, both from the formal world of systems and the informal lifeworld. Four conditional factors are necessary for this to occur, which at the same time are assumed to influence health and well-being: socio-economic security, social cohesion, social inclusion and social empowerment. In this paper we test the utility of social quality in explaining self-rated health as a response to arguments that the social determinants of health (SDH) framework often lacks a theoretical basis. We use multilevel models to analyse national English and Welsh data (the Citizenship Survey) to test for both individual- and neighbour-level affects. Our key findings are that (1) neighbourhood contextual (cross-level) effects are present with respect to collective action, personal trust, cross-cutting ties, income sufficiency, and income security; (2) measures of national, community and personal identity as indicators of social cohesion show clear associations with health alongside more common measures such as trust; (3) the security aspects of socioeconomic determinants are especially important (housing security, income sufficiency, and income security); (4) social rights, including institutional rights but especially civil rights have effects of particularly large magnitude. Social quality offers a theoretically-driven perspective on the SDH which has important policy implications and suggests a number of promising avenues for future research.

A dual‐path psychosocial model of social determinants of health in the community: Results from the Cause Commune program

“…Apart from socioeconomic resources, which are systematically shown to be important in prior research (Saxena et al, 2007), fostering social support and trust can lead to individuals' sense of capacity to act together and reduce loneliness, which in turn could be related to people's health. In this sense, our research joins some policy-oriented frameworks, such as the social quality paradigm (Holman & Walker, 2018), which underlines the necessity to move beyond individualistic conceptions of well-being and quality of life and to place at the center of our attention social quality (van der Maesen & Walker, 2005) in terms of the health and sustainability of the lives of both individuals and collectivities.…”

Application of Hierarchical/Multilevel Models and Quality of Reporting (2010–2020): A Systematic Review

“…In addition, most of the articles, besides failing to report on the estimation procedure, did not measure the intraclass correlation (ICC), which is very fundamental and important in the multilevel modelling framework. In [70][71][72], the value of the ICC indicates the existence of a multilevel structure and therefore recommends multilevel modelling to adequately account for clustering efects which could result in underestimation of standard errors and subsequent loss of statistical power when ignored. Te absence of the ICC in a study to quantify the level of clustering efects could undermine results and fndings since the ICC is very fundamental in informing the use of multilevel models.…”

On how religions could accidentally incite lies and violence: folktales as a cultural transmitter

“…For example, Doré and Bolger found the data on the impacts of stressful life events on well-being are best fit with a varying curve model rather than a varying slope or a varying intercept model, which shows a wide range of different trajectories in life satisfaction different people to show a wide surrounding a negative life event (Doré & Bolger, 2018). A seminal study by Vallerand shows a hierarchical model of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation not only generates a framework to organize the literature on the subject, but also new and testable hypotheses (Vallerand, 1997) (Holman & Walker, 2018).…”