2022
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2022.2095989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social relationships with nature: elements of a framework for socio-ecological structure analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He concludes that the bioeconomy's potential to reduce the extractivist and fossil-dependent character of industrialized agriculture and to alleviate power imbalances is limited at best, due not least to their acquiescence to the agendas of already dominant actors in the respective sectors. This latter aspect is a recurrent theme touched upon in several other contributions of this special feature, including those of Vogelpohl and Boyer et al Examining local-scale examples of change in the sectors and practices addressed by the bioeconomy debate, the case reports by Jana Holz and Philip Koch investigate the effects of promissory bioeconomy policies at the level of concrete, specific bio-based economic practices and the practical rationalities or mentalities characterizing local actors' habitualized social relationships with nature (Eversberg et al 2021(Eversberg et al , 2022b. This perspective can illuminate both the ways in which the promises enable the continuation of unsustainable modes of production and living, and the forms of contesting the same promises.…”
Section: Bioeconomic Transformation: the Making And Re-making Of A Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He concludes that the bioeconomy's potential to reduce the extractivist and fossil-dependent character of industrialized agriculture and to alleviate power imbalances is limited at best, due not least to their acquiescence to the agendas of already dominant actors in the respective sectors. This latter aspect is a recurrent theme touched upon in several other contributions of this special feature, including those of Vogelpohl and Boyer et al Examining local-scale examples of change in the sectors and practices addressed by the bioeconomy debate, the case reports by Jana Holz and Philip Koch investigate the effects of promissory bioeconomy policies at the level of concrete, specific bio-based economic practices and the practical rationalities or mentalities characterizing local actors' habitualized social relationships with nature (Eversberg et al 2021(Eversberg et al , 2022b. This perspective can illuminate both the ways in which the promises enable the continuation of unsustainable modes of production and living, and the forms of contesting the same promises.…”
Section: Bioeconomic Transformation: the Making And Re-making Of A Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Boyer ( 2019 ), current dominant visions of bioeconomy should be framed as a de-facto alternative form of extractivism, rather than an alternative to (fossil) extractivism. In this interpretation, bioeconomy implies both a large-scale, high-speed industrial extraction and a vision of ‘nature’ as a resource at the disposal of humans for economic use (Eversberg et al 2022b ; Lühmann 2020 ). Hence, the negative social, cultural, and environmental effects of fossil extraction and inclusion into global market mechanisms as well as rural development dilemmas might simply continue within a (more) bio-based economy and counteract the sustainability aspirations of bioeconomy actors (D’Amato et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%