The Oxford Handbook of Anglo-Saxon Archaeology 2012
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199212149.013.0044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Transactions, Gift Exchange, and Power in the Archaeology of the Fifth to Seventh Centuries

Abstract: This article explores some structures and dynamics which may have contributed to the development of social and political hierarchies in England in the fifth to seventh centuries, and some of the problems associated with this field of research. In particular, it investigates how some social dynamics and institutions, and the relationships between economic and social dynamics, may be seen to have promoted structures of power in ways that conditioned the development of dynasties wielding local, regional, and even… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(e.g. Bassett 1989, Scull 1993, 2011, Arnold 1997. Overall, we would argue that the archaeological evidence points towards the late sixth and the early eighth centuries as key thresholds of change in the articulation of rulership.…”
Section: Monumentality and Pathways To Social Complexitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(e.g. Bassett 1989, Scull 1993, 2011, Arnold 1997. Overall, we would argue that the archaeological evidence points towards the late sixth and the early eighth centuries as key thresholds of change in the articulation of rulership.…”
Section: Monumentality and Pathways To Social Complexitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Gift giving was a crucial means by which loyalty could be obtained and maintained (see e.g. Curta 2006;Hardt 2013;Nicolay 2014;Scull 2011), just as the fluctuating, unequal relationships of obligation and reciprocity forged by 'the gift' are an important technology of social reproduction in many other societies (Mauss [1925] 2016). In the epic poem Beowulf '[t]he followers fought loyally for their lord, but the loyalty had been purchased beforehand by the upkeep the king provided for his warriors and by the giving of gifts' (Yorke 1990, 17).…”
Section: Reciprocity Obligation and Oath-ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…181 This and other developments in late-sixth-and early-seventh-century England have been associated with the establishment of a more stratified society, best represented by the grandees buried at Sutton Hoo, Snape, and other "princely" inhumations 182 -a society in which exchange and government were more complex and for which coinage as an abstract means of payment and storage of wealth offered practical as well as symbolic advantages. 183 Conditions for the production of the first English gold coins were not, of course, identical to those in the Merovingian kingdom. Imitative coinages do not always mirror their model's organizational background, but the broader context of Anglo-Saxon adoption of Merovingian cultural conventions and adherence-where visible-to Frankish traditions of monetary organization hint that early Anglo-Saxon gold coinage went deeper than superficial imitation in following Frankish custom.…”
Section: Parallels and Contrasts: Anglo-saxon England And Visigothic mentioning
confidence: 99%