2020
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1751-20.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Transmission and Buffering of Hippocampal Metaplasticity after Stress in Mice

Abstract: In social animals, the behavioral and hormonal responses to stress can be transmitted from one individual to another through a social transmission process, and, conversely, social support ameliorates stress responses, a phenomenon referred to as social buffering. Metaplasticity represents activity-dependent synaptic changes that modulate the ability to elicit subsequent synaptic plasticity. Authentic stress can induce hippocampal metaplasticity, but whether transmitted stress has the same ability remains unkno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-term depression is another kind of synaptic plasticity, which is enduring changes in synaptic strength, as a cellular model of information storage and process in the CNS ( Martin et al, 2000 ), and which is used to assess the stress in adult male mice ( Lee et al, 2021 ). In our work, we found a weaker cortical LTD in the superficial and deep layers of the aIC in observer and demonstrator mice, but there was no significant difference between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term depression is another kind of synaptic plasticity, which is enduring changes in synaptic strength, as a cellular model of information storage and process in the CNS ( Martin et al, 2000 ), and which is used to assess the stress in adult male mice ( Lee et al, 2021 ). In our work, we found a weaker cortical LTD in the superficial and deep layers of the aIC in observer and demonstrator mice, but there was no significant difference between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figure 4B), in which an observer can freely interact with a demonstrator that has been stressed (e.g., previously restrained, defeated, shocked, acid or bee venom injected, or presented with a CS+), the observer not only approaches but also sniffs, licks, touches, and allogrooms the stressed demonstrator and does so more often and for longer than when interacting with a nonstressed conspecific [27,49,66,[114][115][116][117][118][119]. The stressed demonstrator, in contrast, engages more in nonsocial behaviors such as self-grooming, digging, rearing, and nesting [115,118,119]. Stressing the observer itself reduces its proximity seeking [12,[120][121][122] (but see [49]).…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motive to approach and interact with distressed demonstrators remains somewhat unclear, but such curiosity could have two benefits. Firstly, proximity maximizes the observer's access to the alarm pheromones produced by the demonstrator, which are most effective at close range [123] and trigger physiological and behavioral changes in approachers when direct contact is possible [96,118,124]. The resulting increase in pheromone exposure increases emotional contagion, including changes in pain sensitivity [27,49] and neural plasticity [118,124], thereby increasing the observer's preparedness to deal with similar threats.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations