2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/hri.2016.7451842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socially contingent humanoid robot head behaviour results in increased charity donations

Abstract: The role of robot social behaviour in changing people's behaviour is an interesting and yet still open question, with the general assumption that social behaviour is beneficial. In this study, we examine the effect of socially contingent robot behaviours on a charity collection task. Manipulating only behavioural cues (maintaining the same verbal content), we show that when the robot exhibits contingent behaviours consistent with those observable in humans, this results in a 32% increase in money collected ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential for social robots (and/or particular HRI design choices) to objectively influence user behavior has been demonstrated in a variety of HRI scenarios, from convincing people to water plants with orange juice (Salem et al, 2015 ) to increasing charity donations (Wills et al, 2016 ) to weakening application of moral norms (Jackson and Williams, 2019 ). Concerning the potential to impact moral norms, should it also be possible that robots can strengthen or otherwise positively influence moral norms, then the implications of Winkle et al's work become two-fold.…”
Section: Subvert Existing Gender Norms Of Robot Design For Feminist R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for social robots (and/or particular HRI design choices) to objectively influence user behavior has been demonstrated in a variety of HRI scenarios, from convincing people to water plants with orange juice (Salem et al, 2015 ) to increasing charity donations (Wills et al, 2016 ) to weakening application of moral norms (Jackson and Williams, 2019 ). Concerning the potential to impact moral norms, should it also be possible that robots can strengthen or otherwise positively influence moral norms, then the implications of Winkle et al's work become two-fold.…”
Section: Subvert Existing Gender Norms Of Robot Design For Feminist R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some such works have specifically considered robot influence on (im)moral user behaviours, e.g. attempting to increase charity donations [23], change perceptions of property damage [24] and prevent littering [8]. We suggest that using social robots to educate about, challenge and dispel gender stereotypes, with the aim of reducing gender bias in users, represents another such application of using social robots to positively influence user attitude and behaviour.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of HRI, several robots have been developed to promote donation [31], which has been treated as a representation of altruistic behavior [32]. In addition, in the fields of HRI and HAI, studies have been done on the factors of robots and agents that promote donation, such as the social background of users [33], where a robot is installed [34], the gender of a robot [35], the appearance of a robot [36], the head behavior of humanoid robots [37], and the facial expressions of virtual agents [38].…”
Section: Related Work a Prosocial Behavior And Altruismmentioning
confidence: 99%