2019
DOI: 10.1002/csr.1768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socially responsible human resource practices to improve the employability of people with disabilities

Abstract: Although the employment of people with disabilities (PWDs) has been recognized as an important human right, it is seldom emphasized in current corporate social responsibility (CSR) practice. Based on experiences with a job training program in hospitality for people with intellectual disabilities or Down syndrome offered by a hotel in Hong Kong, this paper explores how socially responsible human resource (HR) practices can support the employment of PWDs. An A‐B‐C‐D framework is proposed by the author to explore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If corporations focused the most important stakeholders (employees) through CSR activities it may generate several positive attitudes and behaviour‐related outcomes such as employees' satisfaction about their jobs (Barakat et al, 2016; Suh, 2016; Valentine & Fleischman, 2008), citizenship behaviour (Choi & Yu, 2014; Kim et al, 2017; Lee & Seo, 2017), the commitment of employees (Ali et al, 2010; Brammer et al, 2007; Fu et al, 2014; Kim et al, 2010; Peterson, 2004). Based on the above‐mentioned pieces of evidence, we argue that if employees‐centric CSR activities can generate employees' positive outcomes (Kwan, 2020), then they can also play a role to build the customer value co‐creation behaviour. Employees are responsible to interact with the customers directly and, in the banking sector, customers demand more quality‐oriented interaction (Khan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If corporations focused the most important stakeholders (employees) through CSR activities it may generate several positive attitudes and behaviour‐related outcomes such as employees' satisfaction about their jobs (Barakat et al, 2016; Suh, 2016; Valentine & Fleischman, 2008), citizenship behaviour (Choi & Yu, 2014; Kim et al, 2017; Lee & Seo, 2017), the commitment of employees (Ali et al, 2010; Brammer et al, 2007; Fu et al, 2014; Kim et al, 2010; Peterson, 2004). Based on the above‐mentioned pieces of evidence, we argue that if employees‐centric CSR activities can generate employees' positive outcomes (Kwan, 2020), then they can also play a role to build the customer value co‐creation behaviour. Employees are responsible to interact with the customers directly and, in the banking sector, customers demand more quality‐oriented interaction (Khan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking further into the content analysis of the portfolio articles, several issues can be highlighted (Table 7). Firstly, regarding their specific thematic, some of the papers seem to be focused on workers with disabilities inclusion and human resources practices in the hotel industry (such as [18,19,30,74,75,77,79,81,82] or [84]), taking into account the influence of discrimination and psychological aspects ( [19,30,75,77,78,83] or [86]), others are focused on the customers' perceptions of these workers [80,83,85] or in the managers' perceptions of them [73,76,78,86].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the developed methodology, most of the papers carried out a case study methodology ([18,30,75,77,81] or [84]), usually with interviews (to: (a) managers such as [30,73,76]; (b) HR managers: [77]; (c) managers and workers: [75,81,84]; or (d) different people in the organization and outside the company: [18,74,78]). Other articles developed focus groups [75,81,84], non-participant observations [77,84], quantitative surveys (such as [76,79,80,82] or [86]), experiments [80,83,85] or inductive thematic analysis [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations