2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-cultural valuation of Polish agricultural landscape components by farmers and its consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in stark contrast to the expected regard for cultural services, and it highlights that respondents consider the primary function of the landscape is to provide tangible outputs, and that provisioning services is the most comprehensible ES to achieve this aim. The remaining ecosystem services require increased awareness of nature and ecosystem values, and this is also proven in research results from the rural regions of other countries [55,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in stark contrast to the expected regard for cultural services, and it highlights that respondents consider the primary function of the landscape is to provide tangible outputs, and that provisioning services is the most comprehensible ES to achieve this aim. The remaining ecosystem services require increased awareness of nature and ecosystem values, and this is also proven in research results from the rural regions of other countries [55,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, they still exceeded medium values. In the literature, cultural services have the highest priority for stakeholders [50,54], or local identities assessed them as less valuable than other environmental service groups [55]. Moreover, the review of perceived ES benefits in European multi-functional landscapes found that "people's relationship with a landscape and the landscape characteristics related to accessibility" was the main determinant in cultural services assessments [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Schmidt et al [128] used two interactive visualisation methods for rating and weighting to evaluate selected social and cultural functions based on a common classification of ESS [230] of Pentland Hills Regional Park, Scotland, exploring their impacts on land-use preferences from visitors' perspectives. Włodarczyk-Marciniak et al [134] conducted face-to-face interviews with 540 farmers from Central Poland, investigating the social and cultural values of the local agricultural landscape. They noted that due to the impact of the CAP, globalisation and liberalisation of markets, the leisure and recreational functions of agriculture were often neglected by farmers, so that this function was underestimated in results.…”
Section: Social-cultural Valuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 15 to 20 years, many structural changes have taken place in Polish agriculture [13,23,24]. In rural areas in Poland, an increase in the role of non-agricultural production and consumption functions can be seen, at the expense of a decreasing share of agricultural production [21].…”
Section: Rural Areas In Poland and The European Unionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appreciation grows for the interdisciplinary nature of landscape research, not only in the field of geography and other natural sciences but also in humanities and social and engineering sciences [12]. Moreover, the limited number of studies addressing post-socialist EU member states and the studies addressing specific physical components of landscapes encourage the extension of this area of research [13]. One of the gradually disappearing components of rural cultural landscapes in Poland is the scarecrow, even though it was a common sight not long ago [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%