2012
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2010.539573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic status and malaria-related outcomes in Mvomero District, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although malaria is considered a disease of poverty [9], [55] a review of the effect of SES on malaria incidence reports that the evidence is mixed [56]. It has been hypothesised that there are three pathways for low household wealth to be associated with malaria: 1) less access to preventative measures; 2) less access to health care and; 3) increased risk of infection by: poor housing (mosquito entry), houses may be located nearer to mosquito breeding sites and higher susceptibility to illness especially due to poorer health and diet [57]. Access to healthcare was considered in this study but there was no evidence for an association between P. falciparum infection and the distance from the household to the nearest health facility after adjusting for other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although malaria is considered a disease of poverty [9], [55] a review of the effect of SES on malaria incidence reports that the evidence is mixed [56]. It has been hypothesised that there are three pathways for low household wealth to be associated with malaria: 1) less access to preventative measures; 2) less access to health care and; 3) increased risk of infection by: poor housing (mosquito entry), houses may be located nearer to mosquito breeding sites and higher susceptibility to illness especially due to poorer health and diet [57]. Access to healthcare was considered in this study but there was no evidence for an association between P. falciparum infection and the distance from the household to the nearest health facility after adjusting for other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally recognised that people with low SES are usually prone to vector-borne diseases [29][30][31][32] including Dengue, although not in all cases as shown by a recent systematic review of the link between Dengue and Socioeconomic status [33]. Our study described the group that is more at risk than others and the spatial distribution of Dengue virus cases has been produced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We observed the same in the study area because farmers do not visit the health facilities regularly during their illness but instead go to hospital once and then prefer selfmedication [31][32]. A good socio economic status is generally associated with reduction in malaria [11] because the availability of more resources enhances adaptability and the capacity to undertake preventive measures [33][34][35] like using mosquito repellents, insecticide-treated nets, and other precautionary measures to avoid the disease. In severe malaria transmission areas the relationship between malaria and socio economic status is bidirectional [36].…”
Section: Determinant Of Malariamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Poverty, lack of better sanitary conditions, and less availability of proper medical facilities serves as a catalyst in increasing the disease burden. It is diffi cult to control increasing temperature and changing rainfall patterns, but improvements in living conditions providing improved sanitation and health facilities can make the situation better as socio economic status (SES) differences are of great importance in public health issues [11]. Cost in the form of lost productivity and disposable income makes poor families poorer, which can eventually result in death or make people more susceptible to different infectious diseases [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%