2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2007.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-technical Self-Description as a Means for Projects of Introducing Computer Supported Cooperation

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Content or social structures (e.g., responsibilities or access rights) regulating communication are being represented within the technical system as well as the social structures. • Self-description describes and constitutes the characteristics of the STSs and can be found in the oral communication and in the documents of the social system as well as in the technical system's content and structures (Herrmann et al 2007). …”
Section: Beyond Coincidental Connectedness: the Need For Systematic Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Content or social structures (e.g., responsibilities or access rights) regulating communication are being represented within the technical system as well as the social structures. • Self-description describes and constitutes the characteristics of the STSs and can be found in the oral communication and in the documents of the social system as well as in the technical system's content and structures (Herrmann et al 2007). …”
Section: Beyond Coincidental Connectedness: the Need For Systematic Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second research community, it is known that a lot of cooperative activities involves documents and categorizations, not as 'data' but as social and iterative constructs (Schmidt and Wagner, 2005;Israel, 2000). Hence actors need reflexive methods and tools to help them in carrying out self description (Herrmann et al, 2005), building maps cooperatively, expressing conflicts, comparing points of view, and assimilating or imitating conflicting interpretations (Salvador, 1997). For both research communities, focusing on user interpretation is a way to adopt a pragmatic approach to knowledge and to place emphasis on practices (Schoop et al, 2006;Park, 2008;Shum, 2006) To sum up, an increasing amount of research work in Knowledge Engineering and Computer Supported Cooperative Work permits us to think that a more semiotic and pragmatic Web could be possible.…”
Section: A Web Which Is Semantic and 'Social'mentioning
confidence: 99%