2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1516-4446(12)70038-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic influences on alcohol use patterns among private school students in São Paulo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of alcohol use in life (81%) was higher than that observed among adolescents in multicenter studies carried out in Brazil in 2001 (48.3%) 21 and 2005 (54.3%; 60.8% in Southeast region) 13 , higher than those verified in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, in 2009 (74%) 16 , and lower than those described among students enrolled in private schools of Sao Paulo in 2008 (88%) 22 . Differences can be due to social, cultural and demographic factors, but also to an increase in the frequency of experimentation of alcoholic beverages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The frequency of alcohol use in life (81%) was higher than that observed among adolescents in multicenter studies carried out in Brazil in 2001 (48.3%) 21 and 2005 (54.3%; 60.8% in Southeast region) 13 , higher than those verified in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, in 2009 (74%) 16 , and lower than those described among students enrolled in private schools of Sao Paulo in 2008 (88%) 22 . Differences can be due to social, cultural and demographic factors, but also to an increase in the frequency of experimentation of alcoholic beverages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…REV BRAS EPIDEMIOL JAN-MAR 2015; 18(1): [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] No significant differences among analyzed variables from students of peripheral and central schools were found (data not shown), and for this they formed the urban group [n = 557; 306/555 (55.1%) girls; two students did not inform their gender]; sociodemographic characteristics are described in Table 1. In total, 1,012 (61.3%) of the invited students did not participate in the study by reason of not bringing the signed informed consent form, absence to classes in days of questionnaire administration, and one student was not authorized by the mother.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations