Sociological and Environmental- Psychology Research in Estonia during the 1960s and 1970s: A Critique of Soviet Mass-Housing

Hallas-Murula, Karin; Moravánszky, Ákos; Hopfengärtner, Judith

doi:10.1515/9783035608113-012

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The former head of the commission on architecture and construction mentioned: ла до практиків» (Alekseyeva, 2019, p. 97). Критика модерністського планування «згори донизу», що зосереджувалася в академічних колах і розвивалася в діалозі з планувальною практикою, пропонувала сконцентруватися на тих, хто користується міською інфраструктурою, і на їхньому досвіді (Beyer, 2017;Hallas-Murula, 2017;Kurg, 2013). Однією з ідей, які застосовували, намагаючись гуманізувати соціалістичне місто, була концепція «середовища» (рос.…”

unclassified

“…She described the post-Khrushchev period as a time, when "innovative, progressive, or independent architectural thought, which was predominantly concentrated in academic and research institutions, rarely reached the practitioners" (Alekseyeva, 2019, р. 97) ernist top-down planning that concentrated in academia and developed in a dialogue with planning practice proposed to focus on the users and their experiences of the city (Beyer, 2017;Hallas-Murula, 2017;Kurg, 2013). One of the ideas mobilized as an attempt to humanize a socialist city was the concept of "environment" (Ukrainian: seredovyshche, Russian: sreda).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From Frame to Environment: Discussing the Development of Lviv during the 1980s

Otrishchenko

2022

Misto: istor. kult. susp.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper discusses different perspectives related to the urban development of Lviv during the 1980s and shows the gradual shift from planning urban space to planning urban time and experiences. It focuses on two cases. The first one is connected to the Lviv branch of the Dipromist State Design Institute for Cities, which was responsible for preparing planning documentation for the city and region. It worked with functional zoning and applied the macro-perspective to the space of the city. The second one evolved at the Lviv Polytechnic institute and dealt with the concept of the urban environment. It proposed a human-centered approach to city development and took into account not only the spatial but also the temporal perspective. As an alternative to the dominant discourse and practice of city planning, it remained marginal after the collapse of the USSR. For decades Lviv urban planning continues to rely on the concepts and tools coined in the Soviet planning institutions and leaves human experiences of the city largely outside of the discussion.

show abstract

unclassified

mentioning

confidence: 99%