1945
DOI: 10.1086/256247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociological Elements in Veblen's Economic Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thorstein Veblen generally criticizes capitalism in all his works, but there is not a single work in which he clearly demonstrates these criticisms. In his different works, he expresses these criticisms with different aspects (Davis, 1945). However, in his general critique of capitalism, Veblen identifies individualism as the fundamental moral flaw and bad instinctive behaviors that serve individual interests.…”
Section: Veblen's Leisure Class and The Phenomenon Of Conspicuous Con...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorstein Veblen generally criticizes capitalism in all his works, but there is not a single work in which he clearly demonstrates these criticisms. In his different works, he expresses these criticisms with different aspects (Davis, 1945). However, in his general critique of capitalism, Veblen identifies individualism as the fundamental moral flaw and bad instinctive behaviors that serve individual interests.…”
Section: Veblen's Leisure Class and The Phenomenon Of Conspicuous Con...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Coats (1954), the literature on Veblen had neglected his contribution to the methodology of American economics. Davis (1945) also deals with Veblen's methodology and focuses on Veblen's criticism of classical and neoclassical economics, his notion of economics, and the place of sociological elements and ethics in Veblen's writings. Anderson (1933) advocates that Veblen's contribution to economics could be understood as a general theory standing apart from neoclassical economics -as a Marshallian version of neoclassical economics.…”
Section: Most Relevant Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18-19) denotes 'sociological economics'. Furthermore, Durkheim's economic sociology displays a manifest affinity or compatibility with Veblen's ([1899] 1934), Mitchell's (1914), Commons's (1931) and other statements of original institutional economics (Boulding 1957;Davis 1945;Parsons 1935;Furubotn and Richter 2010;Hodgson 1998;Stinchcombe 1997). For example, Mitchell (1914, p. 104) suggests that one needs 'an economic sociology' to address such issues as the 'struggle between the strong and the weak' replacing 'equal opportunity for all', the 'nature and the origin of this inequality in power' and the source of the 'unity of society'.…”
Section: Later Classical Economic Sociology and Neoclassical Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%