2002
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.c200444200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 Block Insulin Signaling by Ubiquitin-mediated Degradation of IRS1 and IRS2

Abstract: Inflammation associates with peripheral insulin resistance, which dysregulates nutrient homeostasis and leads to diabetes. Inflammation induces the expression of SOCS proteins. We show that SOCS1 or SOCS3 targeted IRS1 and IRS2, two critical signaling molecules for insulin action, for ubiquitin-mediated degradation. SOCS1 or SOCS3 bound both recombinant and endogenous IRS1 and IRS2 and promoted their ubiquitination and subsequent degradation in multiple cell types. Mutations in the conserved SOCS box of SOCS1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

27
619
3
11

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 783 publications
(660 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
27
619
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility is that SOCS1 limits the availability of downstream signaling proteins either through ubiquitin-mediated degradation or by competing for the same binding site in the receptor. For example, SOCS1 regulates insulin signaling by ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the INSR substrates IRS1 and IRS2 [28], while it can associate with INSR in response to insulin [29]. Furthermore, SOCS1 binding is not dependent on INSR-pY960, a site required for both IRS1 and IRS2 interaction but overlaps with the alternative IRS2 binding site in the catalytic loop [29].…”
Section: Socs1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possibility is that SOCS1 limits the availability of downstream signaling proteins either through ubiquitin-mediated degradation or by competing for the same binding site in the receptor. For example, SOCS1 regulates insulin signaling by ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the INSR substrates IRS1 and IRS2 [28], while it can associate with INSR in response to insulin [29]. Furthermore, SOCS1 binding is not dependent on INSR-pY960, a site required for both IRS1 and IRS2 interaction but overlaps with the alternative IRS2 binding site in the catalytic loop [29].…”
Section: Socs1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pY960 is the major binding site for IRS1 and IRS2 in the INSR [29], it is possible that SOCS3 competes with INSR substrates resulting in reduced phosphorylation of IRS1 or IRS2 [53]. SOCS3 also binds to IRS1 and IRS2, and abrogates insulin signaling by ubiquitin-mediated degradation of these two substrate proteins [28]. Therefore SOCS3 inhibits INSR signaling by two different mechanisms: by destabilization of IRS1 and IRS2 and by abrogation binding of IRS proteins to the receptor.…”
Section: Socs3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This protein associates with the insulin receptor and suppresses insulindependent receptor autophosporylation and IRS-1 phosphorylation [100]. SOCS-3 also binds to IRS-1 and IRS-2, leading to their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [104]. Immune mediators also affect insulin sensitivity indirectly by modulating the regulatory function of fat, nerve or other cells, e.g.…”
Section: Lessons From Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The members of this protein family contain a central SH2 domain, as well as a C-terminal domain called SOCS-Box, which is required for proteasomal degradation of SOCS-binding partners (De Sepulveda et al, 2000;Frantsve et al, 2001;Kamizono et al, 2001;Rui et al, 2002;Ungureanu et al, 2002). Also, both SOCS1 and SOCS3 have been shown to interact directly with Jaks and thereby inhibit the phosphorylation of cytokine receptors, STATs and the Jaks themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%