Sodium Distribution on the Moon

Abstract

The Moon is significantly depleted in volatile elements when compared to Earth, an observation that has resulted in various formation scenarios leading to the loss of volatiles. Sodium is a moderately volatile element that is a lithophile, which can be utilized as a tracer of the volatile history in planetary bodies. It is also well observed in the exosphere of several bodies in our solar system and exoplanetary systems. But lunar surface sodium abundances have so far been measured only in samples brought back to Earth. We report on results from the first effort to provide a global-scale measurement of sodium on the lunar surface using X-ray fluorescent spectra from Chandrayaan-2. A global average of 1.33 ± 0.03 wt% derived here is higher than previously known. Trends in the sodium abundance indicate a long-lived adsorbate component that could explain the higher abundances reported here, which would act as a reservoir that sustains the lunar sodium exosphere.

Development of a New Lunar Regolith Simulant using an Automated Program Framework

“…The discrepancy of excessive Na 2 O is primarily due to inherent differences in the compositions of terrestrial rocks and lunar rocks (Narendranath et al 2022), and it highlights the need for more detailed study of the samples. It is inevitable that some samples have excessive Na content since sourcing materials from Earth makes it challenging to match precisely.…”

How Does the Thermal Environment Affect the Exosphere/Surface Interface at Mercury?

“…Sarantos et al (2023) demonstrated that these velocities did not fit the line width measurements of sodium around the Moon; instead, the broader and more energetic distribution proposed by Mura et al (2009) explained the lunar measurements. Sarantos et al (2023) attributed the difference between the experiment and the lunar observations to the much lower coverage of adsorbed sodium on the Moon, approaching one-thousandth of a monolayer (Narendranath et al 2022), and citing laboratory evidence that release at coverages near a monolayer is less energetic than from a "bare" substrate. Thus, PSD speeds need to be quantified as a function of adsorbate coverage.…”