2014
DOI: 10.3390/s141223758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft, Comfortable Polymer Dry Electrodes for High Quality ECG and EEG Recording

Abstract: Conventional gel electrodes are widely used for biopotential measurements, despite important drawbacks such as skin irritation, long set-up time and uncomfortable removal. Recently introduced dry electrodes with rigid metal pins overcome most of these problems; however, their rigidity causes discomfort and pain. This paper presents dry electrodes offering high user comfort, since they are fabricated from EPDM rubber containing various additives for optimum conductivity, flexibility and ease of fabrication. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
169
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
169
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibly, the dry system would have a lower skin-electrode coupling conductance resulting in larger thermal (Johnson) noise that elevates the power of the whole spectrum (and lowers the signal-to-noise ratio). This is supported by electrode-skin-amplifier interface models (Chi, Jung, & Cauwenberghs, 2010) and prior observations of higher broadband powers for some classes of dry versus traditional gel-based electrodes (Chen et al, 2014;Chi et al, 2010;Estepp, Christensen, Monnin, Davis, & Wilson, 2009;Mathewson et al, 2017;Zander et al, 2011).…”
Section: Cognitive-motor Effort Assessment Capabilities Of the Dry supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Possibly, the dry system would have a lower skin-electrode coupling conductance resulting in larger thermal (Johnson) noise that elevates the power of the whole spectrum (and lowers the signal-to-noise ratio). This is supported by electrode-skin-amplifier interface models (Chi, Jung, & Cauwenberghs, 2010) and prior observations of higher broadband powers for some classes of dry versus traditional gel-based electrodes (Chen et al, 2014;Chi et al, 2010;Estepp, Christensen, Monnin, Davis, & Wilson, 2009;Mathewson et al, 2017;Zander et al, 2011).…”
Section: Cognitive-motor Effort Assessment Capabilities Of the Dry supporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, dry electrodes are more challenging to use due to higher skin-electrode interface impedance and lack of an adhesive material (as found in wet Ag/AgCl electrodes) to fix the location of the electrode [25]. Increased contact area will reduce the skin electrode impedance [26]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The materials and fabrication processes are similar for contact and non-contact type electrodes, except that the electronics need to be adjusted for each. Some demonstrations include, carbon-nanotube or metal nanoparticle doped polymeric sensors [2][3][4], micromachined flexible sensors [5], minimally invasive needle type electrodes [6][7][8], and capacitive non-contact sensors based on printed-circuit board technologies [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%