2018
DOI: 10.1515/gj-2018-0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft Organizations, Hard Powers: The FATF and the FSB as Standard-Setting Bodies

Abstract: The purpose of this contribution is to analyze two major standard setting bodies, namely the Financial Action Task Force on money laundering and the Financial Stability Board from an international law perspective. It will be demonstrated that they are “soft organizations”, which, despite their loose structure, can exercise “hard powers” in inducing States to comply with their standards.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FATF often expanded its jurisdiction, i.e. found to inspect virtual currencies concerning corruption and ML, although it was not in its ambit (De Vido, 2019). Further, FATF showed concern about the hawala system; nevertheless, the hawala could be used for legitimate and illegitimate purposes (Zagaris, 2007; Passas, 2004; Perkel, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FATF often expanded its jurisdiction, i.e. found to inspect virtual currencies concerning corruption and ML, although it was not in its ambit (De Vido, 2019). Further, FATF showed concern about the hawala system; nevertheless, the hawala could be used for legitimate and illegitimate purposes (Zagaris, 2007; Passas, 2004; Perkel, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FATF recommendations regarded as soft law bodies’ recommendation, then suddenly transform into Hard Law for compulsory compliance by countries seeking loans from IMF and WB. That is a key source of FATF’s coercive power (Dostov et al , 2019; De Vido, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%