2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(07)60015-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft tissue stability at the facial aspect of gingivally converging abutments in the esthetic zone: A pilot clinical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
101
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
101
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Facial soft tissue recession often occurs shortly after abutment connection/crown placement (Bengazi et al 1996, Small & Tarnow 2000, De Rouck et al 2008, but subsequently remains relatively stable during various observation periods (Adell et al 1986, Apse et al 1991, Jemt et al 1994, Bengazi et al 1996, Andersson et al 1998, Scheller et al 1998, Grunder 2000, Priest 2003, Cardaropoli et al 2006, Jemt et al 2006, Rompen et al 2007, De Rouck et al 2008. A thick mucosa (≥1 mm) at the mid-buccal aspect of implants was associated with less mucosal recession compared with a thin mucosa (<1 mm) (zigdon & Machtei 2008).…”
Section: Ii13 Soft Tissue Alterations At Implant-supported Restoratmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Facial soft tissue recession often occurs shortly after abutment connection/crown placement (Bengazi et al 1996, Small & Tarnow 2000, De Rouck et al 2008, but subsequently remains relatively stable during various observation periods (Adell et al 1986, Apse et al 1991, Jemt et al 1994, Bengazi et al 1996, Andersson et al 1998, Scheller et al 1998, Grunder 2000, Priest 2003, Cardaropoli et al 2006, Jemt et al 2006, Rompen et al 2007, De Rouck et al 2008. A thick mucosa (≥1 mm) at the mid-buccal aspect of implants was associated with less mucosal recession compared with a thin mucosa (<1 mm) (zigdon & Machtei 2008).…”
Section: Ii13 Soft Tissue Alterations At Implant-supported Restoratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connective tissue contacts the titanium implant or abutment, but this interaction does not induce apical migration of the epithelium. Rompen et al 2007 assumed that this contact would be better described as adhesion (Guy et al1993;Rompen et al 2007). It is suggested that the adhesion is sufficiently tight to preclude epithelial down-growth, which could induce bone resorption (Listegarten et al 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 A narrow transmucosal design increases the length of the implant-tissue contact and provides a horizontal healing space for the connective tissue, which might reduce the height required for biological width and subsequently the marginal bone loss due to soft tissue adaptation. [11][12][13] According to Rompen et al, 13 in a pilot clinical study, a concave transmucosal profile in 2-part implants led to a better and more predictable soft tissue stability in the aesthetic zone compared to the previous published data on implants with a divergent transmucosal design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings in the literature on other soft tissue penetrating devices, such as amputation prostheses, external fixators, and dental implants, indicate that soft tissue stability may be improved by the use of improved abutment materials (12Y15) and/or improved designs (16). Ideally, a percutaneous abutment should provide conditions for integration with the surrounding soft tissue, thus immobilizing the surgical flap, without having to remove viable soft tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%