2014
DOI: 10.1002/ad.1711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft Tolerance: An Approach for Additive Construction on Site

Abstract: Does high precision have to result in highly defined slick forms? Marta Malé‐Alemany and Jordi Portell of the FABbots research studio describe their unique approach that relies on the customisation of existing mechanical devices and the use of locally available materials. Though exacting in their execution of machine code, they maintain a delight in the natural characteristics of materials that are shaped with a ‘soft tolerance’.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common definition of ‘tolerance’ refers to a permissible limit of variation in a physical dimension or the physical properties of a material, a manufactured object or a system. 24 Allowances are distinct from tolerances in a manufacturing environment as an allowance is a planned deviation from a desired planned form. In contrast, tolerance is an unplanned but expected deviation.…”
Section: Tolerance Versus Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common definition of ‘tolerance’ refers to a permissible limit of variation in a physical dimension or the physical properties of a material, a manufactured object or a system. 24 Allowances are distinct from tolerances in a manufacturing environment as an allowance is a planned deviation from a desired planned form. In contrast, tolerance is an unplanned but expected deviation.…”
Section: Tolerance Versus Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to dynamically act and react, presenting a certain quotient of intelligence, make such systems sensitive to variations due to the interaction between the different actors and components involved in the overall process, such as the anisotropy of the materials used. This therefore progresses from a hard system of standard industrial processes, to a soft one governed by an intelligent responsiveness: combining the customization of tools, use of sensors and computational capabilities (Alemany and Portel 2014;Vasey et al 2015;Brugnaro et al 2016). Such adaptive relationships are defined by Achim Menges as "Cyber Physical Making" (2015) and described as follows: "In behaviour-based making, data is continuously gathered and feedback to the system, which means that new information is gained on the run and new insights can be had; or in other words, design can evolve in the process of making".…”
Section: Dynamic Blueprints and Cyber Physical Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous examples of extrusion-based systems using multi-axis robotic apparatuses have demonstrated the potential utility offered by modeling toolpaths for 3D printing [3], [14][15][16]. Designing continuous toolpaths have several advantages, such as the optimization of material deposition (laying the footprint to take advantage of empty spaces that will reduce the weight of the module) and the reduction of time required for fabrication, two key factors related to the implementation of large-scale fabrication.…”
Section: Toolpath and Shell-like Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%