2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft ultrasound priors in optoacoustic reconstruction: Improving clinical vascular imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For quantitative analysis, the mean intensity ratios between the ROI and the background ROI were calculated to allow for data comparison of different patients, as reported earlier [ 13 ]. As such, the effects of imaging depth and light fluence are minimized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For quantitative analysis, the mean intensity ratios between the ROI and the background ROI were calculated to allow for data comparison of different patients, as reported earlier [ 13 ]. As such, the effects of imaging depth and light fluence are minimized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ivankovic et al showed visualization of the carotid artery with high sensitivity and spatial resolution in vivo using optoacoustic imaging [ 8 ]. More recently, MSOT was used for carotid plaque visualization [ 13 ]. Here, we study if an intravenous injection of bevacizumab-800CW, a near-infrared fluorescent tracer that has been used in pilot studies in surgical oncology, is safe in patients undergoing CEA, a vulnerable patient population with multiple risk factors of cardiovascular disease [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This energy deposition results in a small increase in temperature which produces a thermoelastic expansion and a local pressure increase, which in turn induces a measurable ultrasonic pressure wave [ 13 ]. This process is known as the radio-induced thermoacoustic effect, and it is also used for photoacoustic and optoacoustic imaging [ [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] ]. Under thermal and stress confinement conditions [ 29 , 43 ], the initial pressure distribution can be calculated from the dose distribution as [ 29 , 43 ]: where is the Grüneisen coefficient, a material-specific dimensionless parameter that indicates the conversion efficiency between the absorbed heat energy and the induced pressure ( , where is the speed of sound, is the isobaric volume expansion coefficient and is the specific heat capacity) [ 43 ]; is the dose distribution and is the medium mass density.…”
Section: Dictionary-based Protoacoustic Dose Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected a uniform SoS just below that of water, whereby the highest resolution and contrast reconstruction is obtained. For higher image quality and more precise quantitative measurements, the acoustic velocity mismatch will have to be taken into account in a priori reconstructions using SoS and structural information (note S5) (52)(53)(54). RThAM images are reconstructed based on filtered back projection algorithm and showed using MIP of the reconstructed signals.…”
Section: Signal Processing and Image Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%