1969
DOI: 10.1038/2231222a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft X-Ray Background Flux

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 3-10 keV band, this can be approximated by a power law with a photon index of À1.4. At energies below 1 keV, the background surface brightness exceeds the extrapolation of this power law (Bunner et al 1969). Later observations with gas scintillation proportional counters and solidstate detectors (Inoue et al 1979;Schnopper et al 1982;Rocchia et al 1984) suggested emission lines in the 0.5-1.0 keV band, most likely from oxygen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 3-10 keV band, this can be approximated by a power law with a photon index of À1.4. At energies below 1 keV, the background surface brightness exceeds the extrapolation of this power law (Bunner et al 1969). Later observations with gas scintillation proportional counters and solidstate detectors (Inoue et al 1979;Schnopper et al 1982;Rocchia et al 1984) suggested emission lines in the 0.5-1.0 keV band, most likely from oxygen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data do not seem to indicate a peak intensity at low to intermediate latitudes. This problem in fitting the latitude dependence at wavelengths shorter than 44 A was also noted by the Wisconsin group (Bunner et al, 1969) in attempting to fit their data in an energy region from 0.5-1.0 keV.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The strength of the argument that this radiation is being generated by a process different from that of the remainder of the background depends, to a considerable extent, on how far above the extrapolation of a power law spectrum the corrected soft X-ray measurements lie. The most recent observations (Bunner et al, 1969) still show that there is great uncertainty, but they have measurements over a wide enough spectral range so that they conclude that either a steady-state density model with a temperature -3x 10 6 K (as discussed by Field and Henry) is compatible with the data, or an evolving model with T~ 10 6 K and Q G~Qc /6. It is also clear, as they and others have stressed, that discrete sources of soft X-rays, either in the halo of our Galaxy or on the extragalactic scale, might also explain the data.…”
Section: X-ray Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%