2018
DOI: 10.1002/sia.6446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft X‐ray characterization of ion beam sputtered magnesium oxide (MgO) thin film

Abstract: In the present study, surface and interface characterization of magnesium oxide (MgO) thin film is carried out by using non‐destructive soft X‐ray reflectivity and absorption technique. To get a further insight about the in‐depth and surface composition, secondary ion mass spectroscopy measurement is also carried out. The analysis of the reflectivity data indicates the presence of Mg‐Si‐O layer between the principal layer (MgO) and Si substrate interface. The secondary ion mass spectroscopy spectra corroborate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving toward higher sputtering times, the signal decreases up to the point where the 30 Si signal increases, marking the vicinity of the Ta/SiO 2 interface. Similarly, by moving from the center of the CoFeB layer toward lower sputtering times an increase in the MgO and 18 O signals is evidenced, which indicates the vicinity of the CoFeB(Pt)/MgO interface. The shaded area between 80 s and 42 s indicates the approximate position of the MgO layer, the upper limit of 42 s is chosen based on the change of slope seen in the profiles of OH, MgO, and 18 O below 50 s. The 18 O and MgO profiles, shown in Figure 5b,c, respectively, are convoluted with the SiO 2 and SiC signals at high sputtering times due to mass interference, and do not evolve significantly after gating with negative voltages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moving toward higher sputtering times, the signal decreases up to the point where the 30 Si signal increases, marking the vicinity of the Ta/SiO 2 interface. Similarly, by moving from the center of the CoFeB layer toward lower sputtering times an increase in the MgO and 18 O signals is evidenced, which indicates the vicinity of the CoFeB(Pt)/MgO interface. The shaded area between 80 s and 42 s indicates the approximate position of the MgO layer, the upper limit of 42 s is chosen based on the change of slope seen in the profiles of OH, MgO, and 18 O below 50 s. The 18 O and MgO profiles, shown in Figure 5b,c, respectively, are convoluted with the SiO 2 and SiC signals at high sputtering times due to mass interference, and do not evolve significantly after gating with negative voltages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, by moving from the center of the CoFeB layer toward lower sputtering times an increase in the MgO and 18 O signals is evidenced, which indicates the vicinity of the CoFeB(Pt)/MgO interface. The shaded area between 80 s and 42 s indicates the approximate position of the MgO layer, the upper limit of 42 s is chosen based on the change of slope seen in the profiles of OH, MgO, and 18 O below 50 s. The 18 O and MgO profiles, shown in Figure 5b,c, respectively, are convoluted with the SiO 2 and SiC signals at high sputtering times due to mass interference, and do not evolve significantly after gating with negative voltages. Interestingly, the OH profile evolves independently of the 18 O and MgO profiles, showing a clear decrease in content in the region corresponding to the position of the MgO layer after gating with negative voltages as shown in Figure 5a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations