2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1450049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft x-ray photoemission studies of the HfO2/SiO2/Si system

Abstract: Soft x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with synchrotron radiation was employed to study the valence-band offsets for the HfO2/SiO 2/Si and HfO2/SiOxNy/Si systems. We obtained a valence-band offset difference of -1.05±0.1eV between HfO 2 (in HfO2/15ÅSiO2/Si) and SiO 2 (in 15 Å SiO2/Si). There is no measurable difference between the HfO2 valence-band maximum positions of the HfO2/10ÅSiOxNy/Si and HfO 2/15ÅSiO2/Si systems. © 2002 American Institute of Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

15
80
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
15
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This substoichiometric GeO x interfacial layer may be responsible for poor electrical properties such as high density of interface states in the ZrO 2 -and HfO 2 -on-Ge structures [3]. used to obtain the VBM values [12]. These VB offsets are in good agreement with the results recently reported by V. V. Afanas'ev et.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…This substoichiometric GeO x interfacial layer may be responsible for poor electrical properties such as high density of interface states in the ZrO 2 -and HfO 2 -on-Ge structures [3]. used to obtain the VBM values [12]. These VB offsets are in good agreement with the results recently reported by V. V. Afanas'ev et.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The Hf 4 f 7 / 2 binding energies for as-implanted and annealed samples were 17.2 eV and 17.3 eV respectively, with a splitting between the 4 f 7 / 2 and 4 f 5 / 2 peaks by 1.5 and 1.6 eV, respectively. These values were close to those reported for HfO 2 [12,13]. No shoulder in the Si 2p peak with annealing as would be indicative of a silicate [14] were detected, but Hf quantities may have been too small to detect such features.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] As a result, extensive use of XPS and other surface techniques have recently been reported on hafnium oxide and related systems. [6][7][8][10][11][12] Although HfO 2 has a moderately high dielectric constant and band gap ͑both useful for ultrathin dielectric applications in micro-or nano-electronics͒, charging during photon or electron irradiation can make it difficult to determine the binding energies and/or the chemical states accurately. This, in turn, may lead to incorrect assignments and conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%